ttbn,
I bet he reads every post simply in the opportunistic hope of finding a loophole to get his 2 cents worth of contradiction in.
You obviously don't provide enough loopholes & so he simply doesn't comment !

Dear individual,

I don't comment as much as I use to because there is just so much inanity being posted here.

I mean look at this from you;

"Most conservatives knew that all along but it's good you put it up for the Regressives & sexually challenged to read !
You never know, some of them might not have gone too far down the tube yet & it might shake them towards some common sense !"

What on earth were you trying to communicate by inflicting it on the rest of us? Regressives and sexually challenged? It was about a year 8 English lesson for crying out loud.

Do you really expect me to drop everything and respond to such purile, off topic, claptrap? If I did that every time it reared its head on this forum I wouldn't have time to scratch myself.

The sad thing is that you now represent the middle of the road rightwinger on this site, just peeling off snide little remarks like you just did.

How about you attempt to give the rest of us something substantial to respond to. That would make a welcome change to the drivel you now almost exclusively serve up nowadays.

'Regressives and sexually challenged' indeed. Lift your game mate.

I've seen identity based material from prep level at schools. Very concerning. Thanks for raising the topic ttbn.

'Regressives and sexually challenged' indeed. Lift your game mate.
SteeleRedux,
Well, if you can come up with a more apt definition go right ahead ! As for 'inflicting it on the rest of us?'. Are you actually admitting you're against common sense ? But, you have no qualms about inflicting your warped mentality on those who pull their weight from which you benefit ?
None of us can do without those who perform for the benefit of all so, is it really too much to ask to contribute also ?

"I don't comment as much as I use (sic) to because there is just so much inanity being posted here". (SR)

Much less "inanity" since SR eased off with his own inane comments, I suggest. He still won't address his lie that he takes no notice of my posts, when it is quite clear that he does. Not that I care one way or the other. But, Graham Young is not the only one who sees SR is a dishonest person.

SR could not survive without his play-the-man nasty comments to everyone whom he disagrees with. Rarely does he front up with any of his own opinions; he just jumps on the opinions of others. Still, that's his problem. He has to live with himself

//Regressives & sexually challenged//

I think he's just jealous of those of us who can still get laid. Or at least, that's the only half-way sensible explanation I can think of.

Otherwise we just have to conclude that it's more nonsensical writing from a bloke who often seems to have trouble constructing sentences and paragraphs that make any kind of sense to English speakers. Perhaps he and Dr. Salter's son should take some remedial English lessons together.