WARNING.

If you are seeing adds for 'Muama Enence', be warned it's a scam at worst and extremely misleading at best.

International Women's Day. Ah! lads joining in the celebrations? There's still room on the Old Farts Float for you. Indy Issy ttbn ALTRAV Hassy Joe AC SM runner Fr Jose. Gee, standing room only.

'International Women's Day. Ah! lads joining in the celebrations?'

yeah watching women scratch and bash each other over toilet paper. Very amusing!

Paul1405,
Don't fret & get too impatient, International indoctrinated Git day is only weeks away !

Hey ttbn,
".... organisations that embrace all forms of diversity and inclusion outperform those that don’t".

"I suppose we are supposed to believe that just because it's said. No proof follows, just a bald statements attached to the buzz word 'diversity'."

I wouldn't like to write women off with a position that says they belong in either a kitchen or a laundry.
It's a bit harsh, and mostly unfair as they are capable of doing more and accomplishing things in their own right as well as taking on many positions where gender doesn't really matter.

But I won't promote the idea that 'Women can do anything', No.

I prefer a more realistic approach, and truthfully we can never have real equality, because not everyone can do what others can do.
It's probably more realistic to say most people aren't capable of doing things that others can do.

A 60kg woman can't rescue a 100kg man from a burning building
A 60kg bloke probably won't do it any better.

A 60kg female cop might be more trigger happy in a confrontation than a more physically able cop who's able to restrain someone without shooting them, and this is important when dealing with the mentally ill.

Not everybody is physically able to do work others can do, and likewise not everybody is intelligent enough to do the work others do.

Some people want to work 9-5 and go home.
Others run a business, and for them work never stops.

Diversity quotas are stupid.
I'm happy for anyone to apply, but the positions should be filled on a basis of merit.
There's reasons why we did it that way in the past, it was a system that produced the best results.

The UTS also thinks that females are not up to the standards of males; females will be able to enter STEM courses with 10 fewer admission points than males. So, it's no just physical, it's intellectual as well. Capable females should be insulted.