The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > global environment 2050

global environment 2050

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. ...
  9. 15
  10. 16
  11. 17
  12. All
Not sure why you would need other people's opinions to express your own opinion, Chris. The usual way is to express your opinion first, after which you will most certainly hear the opinions of others - hopefully expressed civilly.
Posted by ttbn, Tuesday, 11 February 2020 10:06:35 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I actually want to hear about ideas about how we can or cannot address the environment.

A number of OLO readers appear to have some expertise and sound logic from thought and experience, so I want to consider their offerings
on this one.

It is a forum after all.
Posted by Chris Lewis, Tuesday, 11 February 2020 10:19:55 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Chris,

One scholar has stated that Western democracy and capitalism cannot achieve a sustainable environment. That it is only socialism that has the capacity to do this.
Posted by Mr Opinion, Tuesday, 11 February 2020 10:38:56 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
i certainly disagree with that.

if there are successful environmental solutions from such nations, please point them out.

if you have a society where all dissenting opinions are legitimised, then you are much more likely to address policy shortcomings.

in socialist societies, which nearly always operate as totalitarian regimes, dissent is hardly going to be tolerated and the truth is often hidden.

a lot of environmental reforms in China since 2011 were driven by public opinion mocking the government story about city pollution, as i will cite in article.
Posted by Chris Lewis, Tuesday, 11 February 2020 10:47:10 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
And look what happened after the invention of the printer.

The poor church and its reliance on a few books soon gave way to challenges from many new ideas that were read by many to rightfully challenge the status quo.

why else do supposed socialist societies try to curtail internet sources and the press? Their silly elites nearly always want to control the agenda.

I heard a stupid piece on the ABC a few weeks ago where they actually discussed banning global warming denialists who opposed the human activity link.

now that is a dangerous path to pursue.
Posted by Chris Lewis, Tuesday, 11 February 2020 11:01:56 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Chris,

I agree with you that socialism is not the panacea for achieving a sustainable environment.

Problem with socialism is that it is just a much driven by the idea of progress as capitalism is, if not even more so. I assume everyone is used to seeing socialist workers depicted with their heads and faces lifted in the direction of progress, commonly depicted on propaganda posters.
Posted by Mr Opinion, Tuesday, 11 February 2020 11:04:01 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. ...
  9. 15
  10. 16
  11. 17
  12. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy