The Forum > General Discussion > Is it uncalled for to compensate rural firefighters or perfectly fine?
Is it uncalled for to compensate rural firefighters or perfectly fine?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
And they save money when fire fighters protect homes and assets from going up in smoke.
Then why don't insurance companies pay the firefighters out of their profits,
Or else we just let those 'covered' properties burn?
Why risk the lives of fire fighters to save property that's already covered by insurance?
i.e. why risk the lives of fire-fighters for nothing?
It actually benefits the nation more to let it burn, because the rebuild paid for by the insurance payout will create jobs.
- And yes I think they should be paid, when say their efforts go above and beyond whats expected from a volunteer, or any significant length of time, that impacts them financially.