Why do ignorant queers misuse the term IQ ?

Dear individual,

Josephus' life style should not be your concern however I will agree an ignorance of what someone's IQ entails is very evident.

Dear Shadow Minister,

You assert;

"A standard tactic of the left whingers is to claim that every conservative is stupid."

No one claimed that here and it was a right winger who raised it in the first place so I could just as easily say it is a standard tactic of them to inflate the IQ of their heroes.

The fact that Trump mentions his IQ often, without ever giving an independent determination of it, speak volumes to his insecurities on the topic.

All I did was dismantle Josephus' sources which I think I did pretty effectively.

I don't understand why people put so much importance on IQ ratings.

I'd much rather speak to someone with an IQ of 100 and four degrees in different fields than speak to someone with an IQ of 200 and no degrees.

SR,

I wasn't just referring to this thread. It was frequent earlier on OLO and is still a common feature in the left whinge media.

Banjo,

It is standard court / senate / congressional procedure for subpoenas for witnesses to challenged if the prosecution or defence believe that the information the witnesses have is privileged. It is upto the "court" to challenge this decision through the courts.

That the congress failed to pursue these subpoenas was entirely their decision.

However, the admission of hearsay evidence any court would be instant grounds for a mistrial, as would the "secret star chamber" depositions and the refusal to call witnesses for the defense.

My assertion is that the democrats were calling for Trump's impeachment from the day he won the election and that ever since obtaining a majority in the congress have engaged in a series of fishing expeditions.

Given the Republican senate majority, the only chance of removing Trump was to convince a significant number of republicans to vote against him, as the flimsy evidence was unlikely to do so, Pelosi and Schiff then attempted to use the process to smear Trump.

However, in doing so tossed any pretense of procedural fairness out the window which was a godsend to the republicans who used this to continually cane the democrats and paint them as essentially corrupting the process which has left the democrats more damaged than Trump.

Which brings me back to my first post where Pelosi is faced with catch 22 where delivering the articles of impeachment to senate is almost certain to be returned with a withering indictment on the articles, whereas holding onto the articles will result in continually mockery and damage all the way to the next presidential and congressional elections.

I'd much rather speak to someone with an IQ of 100 and four degrees in different fields than speak to someone with an IQ of 200 and no degrees.
Mr Opinion ,
Much has been achieved throughout history by people with an IQ of 100 & no degrees & many of these achievements have been ruined & sabotaged to a severe degree by people with an IQ of 200 & multiple degrees !

Dear individual,

You pontificated; "Much has been achieved throughout history by people with an IQ of 100 & no degrees & many of these achievements have been ruined & sabotaged to a severe degree by people with an IQ of 200 & multiple degrees !"

Name one.