Jimmi Hendrix was assassinated by the CIA for his support of the fledgling domestic terrorists, black panthers. Most of their key figures suffered premature deaths.

So the answer is extra judicial killing. That's how the US works.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eVetJ407n_k

Dan

Ah yes Heard Island, I had forgotten about it.
It is even more inaccessible and quite cold. We would not need guards
there, just push them ashore and say survive if you can.
To survive they would learn the necessity of work.
Just imagine no Welfare Jizyaz tax just hard work.
Then for terrorism they could keep an eye on the volcano.
When they see the glow they can worry about being terrorised by rumbling.
Last I heard there were no trees so they could not build a boat.
They could build stone huts. Plenty of food, seals etc.

What a good idea. Now to get the pollies to agree, but I can hear
the lovies now, oh you cannot do that, it is cruel.
Give them the option Heard Is or bang !

This ones for free:

Hendrix profetic:

"All along the watch tower"

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fTCID7fQSQc

Dan

IE.
profetic is pathetic when prophetic alone will do!

Death no minor chord to resolve the issue through.

Dan

.

Dear Bazz,

.

Australia is an active member of the International Alliance fighting Daech, Al-Quaïda, and other terrorist organisations in Syria, Iraq and neighbouring countries.

In my opinion, Australian citizens returning to Australia, suspected of having been associated with the terrorists in some way, should be brought to court and tried for treason under our terrorist laws :

« Section 80 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code makes [treason] an offence punishable by mandatory life imprisonment.

Treason by assisting the enemy :

Under Section 80.1AA of the Commonwealth Criminal Code, a person [also] commits treason if they are an Australian citizen or resident and intentionally engage in conduct that materially assists the enemy in armed conflict against the Commonwealth or the Australian Defence Force. A person is not guilty of treason under this section if the assistance is purely humanitarian in nature.

The offence of treason by assisting the enemy was introduced in 2002, in response to the need to ensure that Australians involved in armed conflict with a terrorist organisation could be dealt with under Australian law. The existing legislation relating to foreign incursions and recruitment was felt to be inadequate to deal with alleged activities by Australian in support of Al-Qa’ida in post-September 11 Afghanistan.

The provision was originally drafted broadly enough that it encompassed activities limited to humanitarian work. The section was subsequently amended to exclude humanitarian activities from its operation. The section originally was not limited to Australian citizens and residents. This was later rectified.

The traditional formulation of treason was extended to cover acts against the Australian defence forces because of a belief that Australia owed it to its defence forces fighting in conflicts overseas to prohibit any other Australians from assisting the other force » :

http://www.gotocourt.com.au/criminal-law/treason-offences/
.

As I have often indicated on other threads, here on OLO, I, personally, consider that for “atrocious crimes” such as child murder, serial killing, torture murder, rape murder, mass murder, terrorism, and premeditated murder that is carefully planned and executed – legal euthanasia should apply – not life imprisonment.

.

Yer Banjo Paterson, is that true.

I think you've been sitting on your recliner too long.

Is this you Alan B? We've already buried nicknamenick. RHOsty, to name a couple of your previous terrorist attacks on OLO.

Firstly, you have soooo much to say on one side of this forum, but on this side you are consistently silent.
If I were chasing down a terrorist, I'd consider this fact as a big red flag, and go looking for evidence.

The first piece of evidence is the stupid you raised in your post above.
The second is the long winded diatribe used to make a simple statement.
The third is the infatuation you hold in appearances, aimed towards legitimising stupid ideas.

And who is a terrorist Alan?
I'll tell you what one isn't. It's not a terrorist that brandishes a carving knife on London Bridge.
That individual is a nut case who should be treated as one: Muslim or not!

Your one Al, how should we treat the insane?

Dan