New Zealand absolutely accepts that Australia is
within its right to deport those who have
engaged in criminal activity in Australia.

The question being raised about the deportation of
individuals who have little or no connection at all
to New Zealand, who for all intents and purposes have
grown up in Australia. These are the cases that the
New Zealand PM was raising. Australia's deportation
of criminals with no connection to New Zealand.

New Zealand does not deport Australian criminals back
to Australia if they've lived in New Zealand for years.
Our behaviour should follow suit. Otherwise as the
NZ PM pointed out - "It's not fair dinkum!

The lady is a statesman, head and shoulders above our last three leaders
We can learn much from her

"New Zealand does not deport Australian criminals back
to Australia if they've lived in New Zealand for years.
Our behaviour should follow suit"

No we shouldn't.
You're saying what NZ does should dictate what we do are you not?
We should decide our policies Foxy not them.
Not on the basis of reciprocity but on the basis of whats best for us.

And I'm fine with Kiwi's putting Aussies on a plane the moment they stuff up.

AC,

We should indeed do what's right for us.
But why just single out New Zealand?
How about China, the UK, and the US?
Should they dictate to us?
Where do we draw the line and why for only
one?

It would be good to see that Grafton-born mass murderer brought back to Aus so he could be put down like a mongrel killer dog.

And runner, crashing through from left field..:-))