Individual,

Mud and faeces slinging, does not count as common sense,
except by sewer dwellers, primates, and mental midgets
with an IQ of a fence post.

Foxy, you should write a book, you come up with some real pearlers, I gotta hand it to you.
Although no maybe that may not be a good idea, because you will get charged with plagiarism as we all know you don't have an original thought worth sharing, of your own.
Where did you copy your response from on that last retort?
That's right, you mentioned it once, was it the "The book of un-original comebacks"?
Keep it up Foxy, your nearly at rock bottom.

The story so far:

* . there is a multitude of mechanisms for 'voice';

* . a case for another, new and improved, 'voice' has not really been made;

* . the difficulty of ensuring that a 'voice' does not become a de facto Third Chamber, one with plenty of power but no responsibilities, has not been thought through; in fact, I don't think the 'voice' has been thought through at all;

* . most certainly, the need for inserting 'race' into the Constitution by recognising yet another 'voice' has not been explained;

* . the successful 1967 Referendum abolished 'race' from the Constitution, so many of us are mystified why it should be put back in, and in this cack-handed way.

Many of us may have the IQ of fence posts, but we honestly - yes, Foxy, honestly - can't understand these demands, except as yet more grabs for illicit power, lucrative employment and spite against the 'system'. We're starting to realise, some of us more belatedly than others (e.g. me), that the flow of demands will never stop.

Get into Google, quick, Foxy, and give us one of your succinct and brilliant rebuttals.

Joe

Loudmouth,
Foxy's last post is dirtier than any mud/faeces slinging so, expect the same.

ALTRAV,

Don't concern yourself about my writing.
I've got a whole stack of caustic quips.
A putdown for every occasion.

I realise of course - as Paul pointed out to you on another
discussion that English
is not your original language, nor is it
your second or third.
And your comprehension skills - well lets not talk about
those. That would be unkind.

You thrive on insults, you poor creature.
You need them to continue your
rants, barks, and raves. But even those are very limited
skills. However, it's all you've got.

Never mind, you do show us the prejudice, bigotry, and
mental midgetry that does exist.
All one can say is - "Dear, Oh Dear!

But even that you obviously don't understand.

Joe,

Pleased to help you out:

http://www.abc.net.au/religion/the-uluru-statement-from-heart-one-year-on-can-a-first-nations-v/10094678

And -

http://www.abc.net.au/religion/after-uluru-australias-politics-of-contempt-threatens-the-soul-o/10095186

There you go dear heart.