The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > No Remorse: Same Old Same Old At James Cook University

No Remorse: Same Old Same Old At James Cook University

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All
Frankly in order for any honesty to take place on uni campus's a very large swamp needs to be drained. Good people like Ridley are likely to be sacked and head nodders to the gw scam promoted. Must be a horrible horrible time to be a genuine scientist.
Posted by runner, Sunday, 30 June 2019 7:10:13 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Steele Redux,
'Hate Speech'...
Where did this 'idea' come from?
Watch the previously linked video.

"Can you please explain why Falou's comments were not hate speech but Yasmin's were?"

I know this wasn't directed at me;
But if you want to get serious

We have freedom of religion right?
Does that freedom of religion mean that those who are religious are free to publicly proclaim their beliefs or not?

Meaning...

Christians can say homosexuals are going to hell.

But if they can say that,
Then...

Muslims can say its ok to kill infidels;
And Jews can say they have a right to rule over goyim.

Christians are so dumb.
On the basis of 'equality' (the 21st century religion) the right that Christians are fighting for is the same one that allows Muslims to kill them and for Jews to rule over them.
- Sorry I digress -

So either you support or respect freedom of religion or you don't?
Or, maybe you just oppose the religious publicly stating some aspects of their religious that you consider discriminatory towards others?

Well guess what?
Wake up Australia, all the religions discriminate against others.

So I'll ask again,
Either you support or respect freedom of religion or you don't.
Posted by Armchair Critic, Sunday, 30 June 2019 9:13:13 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
individual,

I don't think I know who would use freedom of speech to "destabilise". Besides, I would never go for preventing ANYONE from speaking freely. I believe what I say as, I believe, do others who say different things.

Armchair Critic,

What do you mean by 'preference'? First preference, second, third? Which brings me to your fourth paragraph.

I did not vote for the anyone in the lower house at the last election, so I’m not sure who it is I “blindly support”. And I do not “whinge” about freedom of speech; I express it, and respect everyone else’s right to express it, no matter what they say.

Back to Morrison. I don’t know that anyone else is calling the shots for him. You would have to explain that, too. I’m not sure what a “Christian Zionist” is, but I do no take happy clapping with bands very seriously.

I simply believe that Scott Morrison is not up to the job, particularly with the looming threat from China and his unwillingness to stand up for freedom of speech. He doesn’t even have the will to protect his own brand of Christianity in the current anti-Christian age. He, like all politicians, are too remote from everyone’s feelings and beliefs to represent us they way he is supposed to.
Posted by ttbn, Sunday, 30 June 2019 9:41:14 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
This should be bloody interesting.
SteeleRedux,
Folau's comments weren't hate speech, Yasmine's were & you know it ! Stop pretending to be something you're not, a level headed, caring individual !
Posted by individual, Monday, 1 July 2019 8:33:14 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
AC,

What was directed at you was my question as to what you meant by preferencing Labor over Liberal. Did you actually vote Labor? Or, did you mean that you put Liberal below Labor at the bottom of the card, and voted for someone else?
Posted by ttbn, Monday, 1 July 2019 10:52:17 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hey ttbn,
"Did you actually vote Labor? Or, did you mean that you put Liberal below Labor at the bottom of the card, and voted for someone else?"

No, I didn't vote Labor.
And I can't ever foresee a situation where I actually would.
I placed Labor and Liberal either 3rd or 4th, or 4th and 5th.
But I did feel somewhat guilty about putting them ahead of the Liberals afterwards.

The thing that stuck me in my decision was that I saw him as a globalist rather than a nationalist.

And it was on the issue of 'freedom of speech'
- Towing the globalist line and preventing foreign speakers coming to Australia on their speaking tours.
- As well as his stand on moving the Australian embassy to Jerusalem which told me he was a Pro-Zionist or Christian Zionist.

It was these issues that annoyed me, and why I punished the Liberals by preferencing Labor ahead of them.

Western elections really are just 'feces sandwiches' due to globalist politics and political correctness these days.
It doesn't really matter which half of the sandwich you choose.

Sorry I sometimes (maybe unfairly) give you a bit of a hard time on your support for Israel.
Posted by Armchair Critic, Monday, 1 July 2019 1:00:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy