Boazy: "Evidence please"

I'll be charitable and say that your memory is faulty rather than suggest you're being deliberately dishonest (again). How about these snippets from some of your rabble rousing posts to OLO at the time of the Cronulla riots:

"I ask you all, if you have time, to write emails of support and encouragement to the Cronulla Life saving club at this link.

I have recommended they make a CODE which can be phoned to a network of Locals (with brawn) who will phone others, to stream down to the beach if gangs come and to DEFEND IT."

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=3856#22685

"Every Aussie at the moment would be quite justified in carrying a baseball bat or a concealed licenced weapon as they walk about the street"

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=3952#23585

"It would be in the interests of the locals of Cronulla and all beach suburbs to... form networks of communication, so that as u say, one phone call can be sent to a couple of people who can do the same to a few more etc.... Genghis Khan had a few clues. He insisted that each province or village have 1000 men in continual training and on standby for call up as needed. If each major suburb had 50- 100 guys..
Cronulla, Brighton Le sands, Bondi, Maroubra Manly etc etc..

All they would need is a code word and a location by sms to indicate what is happening and where"

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=2552#42869

"The one major mistake the 'Middle Eastern' thugs made, was to attack an ICON of all it means to be 'aussie' in the form of a Life Saver...
To further exacerbate it by claiming it was 'Their' beach, was tamount to infidels attacking the Holy place of Mecca...

They will never ever recover from this. I believe it signals the awakening of Australian race/religious/cultural conciousness which will only end with the total marginalization and social excommunication of Muslims as a whole"

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=3938#22987

There's plenty more, but I think I've made my point.

Whenever someone brings old Hitler into the argument, you know they are scrabbling for words.
I would ask, What the heck was wrong with white Australia anyway?
We began as a poor prison colony and with sheer guts and hard work,became a country of excellence. What was wrong with that?
Now we are a country of Multiculture, we have high crime,ethnic gangs and continual division within our society. We may be Multi but we sure are divided. There is everything wrong with that.

mick

The disappearance of traditional Australia is perhaps symptomatic of the decline of Western civilization in general.

Civilizations, nations and cultures can die in many ways. They can be invaded or annexed by larger powers. Or they can fail to sustain themselves and be overwhelmed by immigrants indifferent to the host culture. Rome, for example, was not conquered from without, but from the multiplication of alien cultures within.

Mark Steyn points to this:

"As a famous Arnold Toynbee quote puts it: "Civilizations die from suicide, not murder"--as can be seen throughout much of "the Western world" right now. The progressive agenda--lavish social welfare, abortion, secularism, multiculturalism--is collectively the real suicide bomb."

http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007760

CJ... good try mate.

You deliberately set out there to assasinate my character, implying that I'm 'egging them on' without stating 'to do what' and who 'them' is.

All of my posts during that period were based on TWO fundamental elements.

1/ LAWFULNESS.

CRIMES ACT 1900- SECT 418
(1) A person is not criminally responsible for an offence if
-the person carries out the conduct constituting the offence in self- defence.
(2) A person carries out conduct in self-defence if and only if the person believes the conduct is necessary:
(a) to defend himself or herself or another person, or
(b) to prevent or terminate the unlawful deprivation of his or her liberty or the liberty of another person, or
(c) to protect property from unlawful taking, destruction, damage or interference, or
(d) to prevent criminal trespass to any land or premises or to remove a person committing any such criminal trespass,
and

I.E.. "LAWFUL BEHAVIOR"

2/ DEFENSIVE.

I guess you must have missed those bits. Can you show me where I advocated ATTACKING or 'going after' people in any other context to 'lawful self defense' ? I doubt it.

The "THEY" who I was 'egging on' were the legitimate voices of peaceful protest, to lawfully defend themselves should the need arise.

Now..you can spin this as you like, but its your conscience (if you have one) not mine.

MULTICULTURALISM.

South Thailand .. an example of the dangers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poQgvVuM3jA

Insurgency in SthThailand. 'began' by self awareness of difference, suspicions of 'being neglected' and treated as 2nd class. It didn't take much to escalate this into what is now a full racial/religious 'jihad'.

Key -"Difference"

...............................................sheesh....

Multiculturalism: Natural and healthy.

Waiting.....................

"These are days to be politically correct with Islam, even when it (Islam) wants to subjugate the entire world under its fold. Many western governments have a lofty ideal—to create a society, where people of different race, religion, culture, and tradition live together in peace and harmony, without losing their root identity. For many years, this policy has sprouted large-scale migration from many impoverished Islamic nations to wealthy countries, such as the USA, Canada, Australia, the UK, New Zealand, and a few European nations.

Happily adopting this Kafir[non-Muslim] multiculturalism, many migrants have successfully integrated with the host nation... There is, however, one exception—Islam. Islam is at odds with this Kafir Multiculturalism, even though they use this policy to their advantage.
The Kafir Multiculturalism promotes religious tolerance, freedom of expression, and democracy. It accords equal opportunity for all, irrespective of race religion, ethnic origin, gender, and sexual orientation. In this policy of Kafir Multiculturalism, the Islamists have found a great opportunity to advance their agenda—to create a pan Islamic world. All the cardinal principles of Kafir Multiculturalism are working in favour of the Islamists. That is why we note that all Islamists are in full support of Kafir Multiculturalism.

Nevertheless, this apparent disposition of the Islamists is just a deceptive ploy to hide their real motive. Behind the veneer of their broad smile, talk of peace, love for freedom and interfaith understanding there is a vicious plan. This plan is the design to replace the Kafir Multiculturalism with Islamic Multiculturalism. This is similar to the Islamists attempt to replace the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) of 1948 with the 1981 Universal Islamic Declaration of Human Rights (see epilogue at the end). We should have no delusion that the Islamists are right on target with the Islamic Multiculturalism, and they are advancing uncompromisingly, confidently, and stealthily towards their goal. Their weapon?—it is none other than Kafir Multiculturalism—exactly the same way they had used UDHR as a weapon in the past." by Abul Kaem
http://www.islam-watch.org/AbulKasem/Islamic-Multiculturalism-Endless-Jihad.htm