More typos in the second link.

Sorry:

http://www.koldercentre.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/kolder_A4_long_E_singles.pdf

Just repeating stuff doesn't make it any more valid or useful; you just become more confused. Typos. That's not all. Here's more. Plus steak knives. We all know where you get your dicky info. We know what the loony left thinks.

Victor David Hanson, American commentator. He writes about America, but just look at what we, with our much-envied border protection policies, are missing out on. He is outlining why so many middle-class voters are angry, and why they won’t vote the way the Left wants them to.

“illegal immigration and open borders have led to chaos. Lax immigration policies have taxed social services and fueled multicultural identity politics, often to the benefit of boutique leftist political agendas.”

In the US, of course, but ain’t it grand that we Australians have avoided this with our border protection policies, even though we could have done without the unpleasantness we do have because of inappropriate immigration, legal and illegal. But, the Left still wants us to go down the same road as the US and Europe.

One that does apply to us though , is globalisation, which has: “enriched the cosmopolitan elites who found worldwide markets for their various services. New global markets and commerce meant Western nations outsourced, off-shored and ignored their own industries and manufacturing (or anything dependent on muscular labor that could be replaced by cheaper workers abroad)".

Australian politicians, like all globalists, have to have it driven home to them that their first priorities are domestic not global.

Can we leave our biases in the bucket at the door, briefly?
America is it not a nation of immigrants?
Its once proud send me your poor was so great
How many world countries are monocultures
How could any country become one culture
What is it we hate about other cultures
In the end a single world single people may be the best outcome

According to ABC News Radio today, the High Court has ruled that two doctors can OK a medivac move from Nauru or Manus for an illegal WITHOUT having to examine, see or speak to the illegal. Thanks Labor, thanks politician-for-10-minutes Phelps.

ttbn,

Your earlier comments about me?

How rude.

I do have eye problems. They can be fixed and
will be.

But your apparent problems are probably beyond help.

Now back to the topic of refugees.

Australia has to comply with its legal obligations.
It is a signatory of the 1951 Refugee Convention.
It also played a key role in drafting treaties
that protect
people fleeing persecution and other forms of serious
harm. And as stated in the Kolder Centre's Report,
these agreements reinforce rather than undermine
Australia's sovereignty, providing the framework
within which governments can manage their borders
yet still co-operate on matters of common concern.

Regarding the Medievac Bill. This became law in February.
More than 40 people have been transferred from
off-shore detention on Manus and Nauru to Australia for
urgent medical treatment.

After about 6 years the demand for assistance per day with
doctors completing an average 8.2 medical triages per day.
Dr Sara Townsend who's been co-ordinating the team of
doctors responding to the emergencies said -

"We've been working rapidly and around the clock to
ensure critically ill people are assessed by doctors
for transfer as quickly as possible. After almost 6
years the demand for assistance with applications has been
huge."

The Medievac bill gives doctors a lifeline to assess
sick refugees. As Dr Townsend tells us -
it does not
diminish the responsibility of the Australian government
to look after the people in its care.

The Australian government cannot "contract out"of its
obligations by sending people to other countries.