Well individual, I'm without sin, and I'm more than happy to stone a pedophile to death, dwarfism or not!

I actually know a family who's son did exactly the same in NSW. he got ten years, and has only just been released. Obviously his toilet needs were of the normal kind.
And oh...his parents were not the local member of parliament.
That was obviously a factor.

Just put this one beside crooked election outcomes, for a Siamese twin of elitist privilege at work!

Dan

Diver Dan,I tend to side with Foxy and Belly on this one as I can see the judge had a delima, certain by the number of charges he needed a jail term but if he did not actually physically harm anyone and no doubt jail for him would be much harder than for those of normal growth. These factors need to be considered.

I have cases on file here where those charged with rape go unpunished. In Nth Qld 9 males raped an 11 year old girl and none received jail although 3 were adults and she had to leave the community because others blamed her for causing the young blokes to get into trouble. The minors did not have sentence recorded.
In another case a bloke spent a year in jail for rape of a 12 year old girl and when released he raped her again and is now serving 4 years, probably 2 with remission.

What about the infamous Tennant Creek situation where an 18 mth old baby was raped, causing massive internal injuries. I do not think anyone has yet been charged.

Only today a 31 year old man from Mackay was charged with the rape of a 12 mth old baby. Due in court again in June so no details available.

There are some horrible people and it is no wonder I and others would like to see capital punishment brought back for heinous crimes.

My observations are that aboriginals and refugees get let off or far less penalty than others for sexual assault

Did he actually assault anyone ?

Henry L.

I don't subscribe to your line of thinking at all.

These charges are child sexual offences. IE child!

They no doubt would be disgusting videos of children used in the act of sexual abuse; most likely Asian.

Most likely also, he entered a web site monitored by the police. A sting.

The reason for the police sting being, porno sites such as these, are set up for Australians ( in this case),to pre- browse with the intention of engaging in sex with Asian children when travelling to Asia, for that express purpose.

You can bet Henry, this innocent little dwarf was engaging (or intending to engage) sexually with children.

Thus the case I mentioned with ten years attached to it, was one such sting, and down he went!

The word is out there. Don't be caught browsing these sites, its a crime.
It is Australia's honourable attempt, to protect vulnerable Asian children.

Don't have sympathy for this character Henry. He got off because he is a politicians son.

The cases you mentioned are unbelievably horrific. They are simply unimaginable to normal people. Obviously the perpetrators are not normal.
But why is that an excuse for leniency?

Dan

But why is that an excuse for leniency?
Dan,
Only when it comes to higher profile people who happen to fall out of favour with their ilk & lose the protection !

We deserve the law system if we do nothing
Ithink the law, quite often is bought and paid for before the case gets to court
Too that the costs of putting some in prison, are given far more weight than the victim