At “World Government Summit,” Globalists Push UN Agenda 2030

Top globalists are coming out of the closet. Thousands of leading globalists, communists, Islamists and others from around the world converged on the Arabian Peninsula this month for the World Government Summit. Their goal: promote technocratic globalism and plot the future of what they often call their “New World Order.” Senior officials from the United Nations, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the European Union, Communist China, central banks, and even the Trump administration showed up to mingle with heads of state and advocates of Islamic Sharia law from across the region. Even Pope Francis delivered a message. As usual, despite top U.S. media outlets partnering with the summit, the establishment press in the United States largely failed to inform Americans about it.

News releases promoting the World Government Summit — yes, it is really called the World Government Summit — boasted that the event “is setting the agenda for the next generation of governments.” And one of the key goals of the summit was advancing the implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), often referred to as UN Agenda 2030. UN Deputy-Secretary General Amina Mohammed opened the summit by demanding that the radical UN scheme be implemented to avoid “life-threatening consequences for billions of people.” UN “High Commissioner for the 2030 Agenda” Cristina Gallach echoed the hysteria. And throughout the summit, more than a few speakers touted the controversial UN agenda as if it were the key to saving humanity from every problem under the sun.

The UN goals, as this magazine has documented, include national and global wealth redistribution, government control over the economy, globalist indoctrination of all children, surrendering more sovereignty to global institutions, and much more. They are essentially a “master plan for humanity,” as UN bosses put it, to build a global technocratic government that would dominate every facet of human existence. Unsurprisingly, the mass-murdering Communist dictatorship enslaving China boasted that it played a “crucial role” in developing the UN agenda.

Con't via link

http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/asia/item/31542-at-world-government-summit-globalists-push-un-agenda-2030

The first step to conquering this rubbish is for all countries to sever ties with the UN. The problem with that is, politicians no longer want to take responsibility for their own countries. The EU demonstrates this. Local politicians can still be big fish in a little pool, but they can blame Brussels when the electorate complains. Local politicians still keep their cosy, overpaid sinecures - but they don't have to take responsibility.

The only people who can stop world government are the millions of voters in still-free countries; but will they act? History and the slave mentality of modern human beings suggests not.

There's something else. If you trawl the internet enough, you will come across some pretty nutty stuff, much of which is total lunacy, deliberately put about by nutbags who like to scare people.

Maybe a 'world government' should start with bilateral agreements, even unanimity, for a common government, between neighbouring countries, like India and Pakistan; Australia and New Zealand; Turkey, Saudi, Israel and Iran; Turkey and Russia; Turkey and Greece; Russia and Ukraine; Britain and the rest of Europe; the US and Canada; etc. All of that should take only a few months. Maybe a bit longer.

Once that first, easy step has been made, and electorates around the world convinced of its worth, larger groupings can be attempted, like China, India-Pakistan, Russia, Turkey, Japan and North Korea. Then maybe Africa - after all, Africa Must Unite. Then maybe Europe, but that might take more time.

And once a world government has been imposed over half a billion square km, and eight billion people, in a multitude of geographical and historical situations, perhaps the down-to-earth business of how to govern at a lower-level, i.e. nation-states, can be worked out. And at lower levels again, like states and regions.

OR we can leave things more or less like they are. I think it's wonderful that a few people can spend their lives trying to bring about the ridiculous, it shows something of the battiness of many ideas.

Joe

Few short parts from article.
"As in previous years, some celebrities showed up to lecture humanity about the alleged need to submit to global governance and sustainable development to supposedly save the planet from humanity. Actor Harrison Ford (shown), for instance, went on a tirade against “nationalism” and “isolationism” after a bizarre segment in which he pretended to speak for “nature.” “I could give a damn with or without humans, I’m the ocean,” Ford said, pretending to be “nature” while speaking in a strange voice. “I covered this entire planet once, and I can always cover it again.” It was not clear whether he intended to refer to the biblical flood of Noah's time or some other period during which he believes the oceans may have covered the entire planet."

"Globalists were everywhere at the event. IMF boss Christine Lagarde, who suggested the IMF might be moved from Washington to Beijing, was a key speaker. Other leading globalist managers speaking at the summit included the scandal-plagued chief of UN WIPO Francis Gurry, who has come under fire for retaliating against whistleblowers and trying to have a reporter prosecuted. UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) chief Audrey Azoulay, a socialist working to standardize the indoctrination of children worldwide, spoke as well. UN Development Program (UNDP) boss Achim Steiner, UNICEF boss Henrietta Fore, UN General Assembly President Maria Espinoza, World Food Programme chief David Beasley, totalitarian-minded UN SDG peddler Jeffery Sachs, World Economic Forum (WEF) boss Klaus Schwab, and numerous other globalist leaders spoke there, too.

Among the prominent “media partners” of the World Government Summit listed on the website were The New York Times, the Financial Times, Bloomberg, CNBC, the “fake news” kingpins at CNN, Sky News (owned by the owner of Fox News), and many others. It was not clear how they were expected to maintain impartiality about the agenda while also sponsoring the summit."

** The above is only one of a number of groups that want a OWG, each one wants to be in control.