'I'm not aware of any "Greens" being investigated by
the Royal Commission into child sexual abuse.
Do give us some evidence. Otherwise you're again
talking through your ...'

I am not aware of any INdigeneous or Islamic Imans being investigated by the Royal Commission. You really are naïve Foxy and that is being kind.

runner,

Blame it on my religion.

Foxy,

True, but some of them do enjoy a bit of sex in the Defication and Urination Conveniences.

Patriotism is now considered racism.

Communists are similar to Conservatives in a way- Communists believe that they are democratic because everyone is part of the party- Conservatives believe that they are democratic because women are part of the family.

At least that's the way Conservatives are presented.

The fact is women and men are different and fill different roles in society. We don't know how this is embodied in nature and nurture- though some Liberals claim that everybody is equal- Conservatives believe in a competitive selection process- Conservatives believe that leaders should have certain characteristics- perhaps that includes time served in the military. In ancient times land holders were male because they had to be capable of defending the land. In a boxing match women will tend to be outmatched by men. Women tend to be nurturers and not as aggressive. Aggression can be negative and positive for survival of the tribe. Conservative Traditionalists use this natural society as a touch stone (different than Locke's Liberalist "naive view" of natural society- all men are equal). In tribes the strongest is valued and is considered an important element in the tribes security- Conservatives share this view perhaps. The strongest member also needs the tribe. Animal societies are the same.
The dominant animal is usually the largest male- there is significant risk in being the largest male- constant challenges to their authority - and benefits including their choice of mate and food preference.
Female members of the tribe contribute based on their disposition. Many of these things are somewhat hard wired into the brains of all species depending on their development. Humans do have the capacity to reason- and override their physiology- with some risk

In a confrontation the common reaction for animal females is to capitulate to the male- also with beta males- usually sexually. This would present a problem in human politics- when the fate of the community is at stake- it is a simplistic comparison but emphasizes the danger.

I plead the Socrates defence "I don't know" but Jordon Peterson's solution is for the system to embody "equality of opportunity" not "equality of outcome". For son's, father's, husband's it make's sense to value the input of "value added" feminine input for the strength of the family. This is the challenge to modern women to create value in the family- to make the family stronger more stable to increase it's survival- with power comes responsibility.

If a person is capable they will be given additional responsibilities.

Leadership is a duty not a right.

The burden of gender role is difficult for males and females- there are benefits and duties. I have my duty- and I respect my ancestors- I hope I will honour them by my effort. Life is suffering- the wiser we are the greater our capacity for suffering- we shouldn't be led down the path of nihilistic pleasure seeking to relieve our suffering- pain shouldn't divert our duties.

There is Nobility in Traditional Conservative Duty.