The Forum > General Discussion > Justice delayed
Justice delayed
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I do have big concerns with the kind of "justice" which leaves someone having to defend themself against charges for something alleged to have happened more than 40 years earlier. There are times when delays make some sense, the alleged perpetrator not being able to be located being the most obvious.
I've also got some sympathy for the then child victims of institutional abuse and the reasons why so often those compliments to have taken a long time to be raised although I think we are at or past the point where we should be putting some time limits on the reporting of historical offences. What I've read of the allegation against Jarrett don't appear to have any good reason to justify the delay which should reasonably override the trauma to him of the process of innocent. I gather that it's hard to get a conviction after such A length of time but it's also hard to defend yourself. How did a particular conversation go one Saturday night back in September of 1979? Who else was there who might be able to act as a witness? Innocent or not the process of being charged and brought to trial will have a toll. In an era when some powerful voices and openly proclaim the need to believe the victim and equate accusing with being a victim some will consider Jarrett guilty regardless of the outcome of the trail. Something really wrong here with this version of justice.