The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Climate scientists calculations must be wrong.

Climate scientists calculations must be wrong.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. ...
  8. 25
  9. 26
  10. 27
  11. All
I don't get it . BAS says there is climate change and melting. This science doesn't fit denial .

".. combined with climate change, according to new measurements by the British Antarctic Survey (BAS)."

The mid-Atlantic Ridge and Pacific vulcanism have been heating stuff for longer than gold-fish can remember. It's undeniable.
Posted by nicknamenick, Thursday, 29 November 2018 4:36:38 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Climate change is ongoing & there's nothing we can do about it !
Anyone ever heard of evolution ?
Just because it doesn't suit us doesn't mean it's not real.
Posted by individual, Thursday, 29 November 2018 4:55:38 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
//This is why they don't release any research.//

They release heaps of research:

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=climate+science+journals&oq=climate+science+journals&aqs=chrome..69i57j0.7807j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Which you presumably ignore because you don't read scientific journals. Which is fair enough, there's thousands of the buggers and I don't read them all either. But to claim the research doesn't exist because you personally have not read the journal articles which detail said research is nonsense on stilts.
Posted by Toni Lavis, Thursday, 29 November 2018 5:20:24 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
//there is big money to be made if you as a scientist//

Wow, some people really will believe anything.

Science really isn't that well-paying a profession. If people want big money, they should study law instead. Or forget about studying altogether, become a professional athlete, and get paid bazillions to chase a bit of inflated leather around a paddock for an hour or so once a week.

//no government is funding research to prove it is false.//

Yep, that research is being done by the private sector, who tend to pay better than government grants. It's still not great pay, mind you.

//what if there are other things the instruments they are using can't detect.//

Things like the sound of one hand clapping, trees falling in forests, that sort of thing?

Scientists leave those things for navel gazers to ponder and get on with their job.
Posted by Toni Lavis, Thursday, 29 November 2018 6:56:24 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I note that this phenomenon was reported in conjunction with climate change. There was nothing about 'this is it - everything else is wrong'.

All the climate crooks' lies will continue. Every time nature proves that their cause and effect theories were completely wrong, they invent a new lie.
Posted by ttbn, Thursday, 29 November 2018 7:52:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
ttbn
Your logic seems a bit wonky . Can you connect your two thought?

"How could Climate Scientists have arrived at the conclusions they did when this important factor was unknown to them." Philip S. November 2018.

"Researcher Tom Jordan believes the process of melting observed has likely been going on for thousands or maybe even millions of years, but isn’t directly contributing to “ice sheet change”. However, in the future the extra water at the ice sheet bed may make this region more sensitive to external factors such as climate change,” he said."

The AGW conclusions are about now . The radioactivity has been part of the ancient balance of heat /cooling. It may affect the future increased glacial flows from AGW .
Posted by nicknamenick, Thursday, 29 November 2018 8:15:45 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. ...
  8. 25
  9. 26
  10. 27
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy