I was party to an interesting discussion in which it was pointed out that based on world wide incomes the threshold for the top 1% of earners started at about $40 000 p.a.

Perhaps the greens as one of the wealthiest groups should be protesting against themselves?

how about 300000 to 400000 presenters on abc spreading victimhood and marxism.

leave a zero out SM? forty grand is not the right figure if it was it would be the top eighty percent.
Nice kick in the ribs for the greens however but if they only earned that they would belong in my battlers party.

he's on the money for world 1% . The national minimum income for the top 1 percent in the U.S. is $421,926, according to a new report.
It may explain why some risk their lives in Indonesian fishing boats but probably not always "refugees" in the Nazi escapee sense.

Nah Shadow, too busy watching the Coalition misfits in Canberra wrecking Australia. Now how much is ScumMo paying himself, $527,862 wow! The blokes a joke, the Liberal party is a joke and not worth 2 cents.

Now its been revealed the Liberals demolition partner, the National party is crawling with Nazi's. They might kick out a token few, but the majority will keep their guernsey. Do you think those booted by the Nats will be welcomed into the extreme faction of the Liberal Party to chew the fat with the like minded. For all we know they could even be candidates at the next election. Are you in agreement if they win they should get a big pay packet to put them in the top 0.1% of earners?

Another interesting statistic I came across recently is that people on average incomes in the west are, in terms of real wealth, in the top 0.0001% of all people who've lived in the last two millennia.

It truly is a golden age.

A shame so many don't see it or understand how it happened.