Oh dear Foxy,


CNN and NBC are reputable (??) but the Dept of Justice is 'some organisation'.

NBC have been outed as having hidden data that showed that one of the accusers (Ramirez) was likely lying. But they are reputable.

Meanwhile the DOJ is being asked to look into charging a woman who admitted lying and they are some organisation??

I wouldn't have enough allowed posts over the next week to cover all the irreputable actions of CNN but this is a mere flavour....

http://www.dailywire.com/news/23206/koi-gate-cnn-deceptively-edits-japan-video-show-emily-zanotti

"I make up my mind on a case by case
basis."

Yes I see that. If the case isn't what you want to be true its ignored. Otherwise its reputable.

mhaze,

The organisation that I referred to in response to your
raising it regarding women - was the "metoo," organisation
not the Justice Department. I would have thought that
this was self-evident.

As for the rest of your post?

I can see what you believe - thanks for sharing.

Q! there did it, some Americans fall at the feet of that letter, Q see they think it is code for some thing they are not sure of but like it as it in their view is on Trumps side.
madness but that is modern day right of reality for you. Q

The left, in a desperate attempt at trying to make themselves even marginally relative, keep coming up with insignificant and irrelevant things, which are mainly means of deflection, such as trying to latch on to owning the ridiculous notion that they are the instigators and the promoters of this spurious attempt to change the titles of 'left' and 'right' to 'progressive' and 'conservative'.
Did you catch the subtle 'pat on the back', or to put it in their language, 'look at moi, look at moi'.
Progressive my arse.
And the right is 'conservative'?
If you mean we are mature and focused with actual achievements which benefit everyone, just to scratch the surface, then YES!
If by 'progressive', you mean out of control, immature, irrational, narrow views, no foresight, and much more then, YES!
The left don't get to make major decisions because they are incapable of the three dimensional thinking involved, and the size of the parameters involved.
The left can only see what is directly in front of them and imagine the rest.
That's OK because they have the mental capacity and maturity of children so we pat them on the head tell them how wonderful they are and move on allowing us to make the 'real' decisions and implement them.
Oh, news flash, stop using words like 'hard working Australians', that's a myth.
The 'hard working' meter was thrown out very early as one of the blackmail demands of the unions.
I think I saw one in a museum dedicated to a time before unionism, it was a telling experience walking through the displays.
It showed what a 'worker' actually looked like.
Then we entered the new and bigger museum of the post union era.
We could not see a display of a 'worker' let alone a 'hard worker'.
We saw people taking smoke breaks, paid maternity leave, standing around laughing and carrying on, and plenty more, especially in the 'hall of entitlements', it went on forever.
But we never saw this fictional person, the 'hard worker'

Political commentators tell us that -

The Coalition government is polling at around
46 to 54 on current indications. On any measure
that's an incipient electoral wipe out. Right
now the government is in the position of
Wile E. Coyote after running off a cliff; its
legs are still pumping but the final plunge is
only a matter of time. And that means politics in
Australia is about to get very weird. The government
continues to govern because it must. But it has no idea
what it is governing for, or what it wants to achieve
in the next six months.

We're warned that there will be many more hare-brained
schemes, wacky Senate votes, and policies-by-announcement
in months to come.

Interesting times ahead.

Foxy, so how is that any different from what we have been putting up with for the last hundred years or more?
Nothing changes, only the date.