The Forum > General Discussion > Republic of Australia Yes or No
Republic of Australia Yes or No
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Page 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- ...
- 87
- 88
- 89
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I'll tell you what, because Prince Charles already has a connection to Australia, (he schooled here) but he will become King Charles upon his mothers demise, so he will have to reside in England as is customary, but, we can aspire to having Prince William as our 'Australian Monarch' in residence.
This idea fits well because he is the next heir to the throne after his father, so this would be like an apprenticeship for him, and we would have a 'Monarch' as our own rightful head of state.
Thank God it will never be an Aussie.
Wouldn't that be ironic, everyone flapping on about not being a colony under the protections of 'mother England'.
It is exactly the same as the prisoners demanding the warden leave so the prisoners can run themselves, which also involved giving them the keys to the safe and the main gate.
You ask what the benefits would be by remaining a Monarchy?
I respond by asking what the benefits are by becoming a republic?
I can say, with proof of other countries as examples, that by becoming a Republic, we will be MORE vulnerable to the antics of dishonest and corrupt officials, many times worse than under the tutelage of a higher and independent authority, like the Royal family.
As a Republic, WE the people WILL be WORSE OFF!