Belly - I hope you don't mean the ttbn who can't answer a question relating to a ludicrous statement he made even though he has been asked it 3 times, you will note he has a lackey individual as a mouthpiece who sometimes comes to his defense.

ttbn for the 4th time. This will be the last time I ask it in this form so you are free to ignore it like usual, after all it is difficult to defend the indefensible.

Quote "People who are keen to display their findings by putting up references are only going to 'find’ references that support them. Fair enough, if they are that desperate to be 'right’. However, for every supporting reference they find, there will be one that says the opposite."

I would like you to point out just a few posted threads where the originator started a thread about any subject and proceeded to give the for and against arguments that related to the subject of the thread.

It would be like posting a whole debate for and against.

That includes any where you have done that.

Tina Faulk in Spectator today reminds us of another woman who, like Ms. Guthrie, ‘didn't see it coming’ - none other than the 'popular’ Julie Bishop, now languishing on the backbench. Whereas Guthrie is fuming and threateningly legal action, Bishop, smiling through “gritted” teeth, is “dissing” the Liberal party.

And today, we learned that the ABC chairman also wanted to sack Emma Alberici. The ABC is certainly providing us with more entertainment than it usually does.

Not a good time for the ladies, all connected to politics one way or another. Faulk reminds us that “Hell hath no fury like…” etc, so we are in for a lot more fun yet.

ttbn Quote "Not a good time for the ladies, all connected to politics one way or another. Faulk reminds us that “Hell hath no fury like…” etc, so we are in for a lot more fun yet."

So are you implying there is an orchestrated witch-hunt on or against females?

Michelle Gutrie was not connected to politics at all.
That was one of her major flaws. She apparently lacked
political nous and she was unable to inter-act with
actual politicians. She did not have good relations with
the Board, the general public, and with her staff. She
was not a good communicator - and unable to "sell" her
vision of the ABC to anyone, not even her employees.
She was also perceived as being too weak in the face of
continued government attacks.

The decision to sack her could not have come at a more
critical time - with the ABC facing funding cuts of $84 million
at the same time as the SBS budget having been boosted.
It was a surprise she was sacked in such an unusual way.
However it shows just how bad relations had become.
Still she did get the "Golden Handshake" of $1 million.
Perhaps -they should have looked at her lack of journalistic
experience prior to her appointment.

another failure of quotas (affirmative action) as demontrated by Foxy's post. The whole dogma has resulted in humilation for Guthrie (who seems to be a nice lady) and cost the tax payer heaps again.

funny irony that the abc continued on the lie that Murdoch ordered the firing of Turnbull. Media watch's pathetic attempt to continue this line has as much credibility as the metoo movement. How ironic that its the leftist/feminist now ordering the firing of those who don't toe the putried Marxist line.