Lot of pain in this area but once you hold your child in your arms many would not want to know it was never theirs
The child may not want change.
But your kids that are yours may not need to suffer because you foot the bills for another's child justice matters

Where would all this end though? If there are any doubts or queries about the paternity of your child, then DNA tests can be done. If you don’t want to have children or have this apparently rampant paternity issue as a worry, then just abstain from sex, or wear condoms at all times?

I don’t like any member of a supposedly loyal couple having destructive affairs, especially if it will mean that the paternity of any children born is in question. It isn’t fair on the children either.

I would imagine that if this were a really prolific problem then DNA testing would be made mandatory. Obviously, it is not though.

Suseonline well the most recent but far from only public case was a ten year not the dad who had a one night stand with the mum.
He paid and paid and his family, [he wed after that one nighter] suffered , he was even forced to make a multi thousand dollar bank withdrawal twice, he finally got the DNA test, but she can not repay him
the very same people who hunted him haunted him for the support are in charge of getting it back, and at best are not trying very hard.
Yes this area would kill relationships, so very many hearts would be broken, in fact it would be unwise for every child to be DNA tested.
It may well happen, we will be poorer for it.
But once a dad is ordered to pay support the first step must be proving he is the dad

Sexuality is an animal need. To say people need to control their sexuality just creates pressure. The limbic brain starts to dominate the neo-cortex. The Catholic church for hundreds of years encouraged the masses the outlet of marriage- gender based roles limited interaction of the genders- perhaps gently encouraging people to exercise restraint- in order to preserve stability in society.

Author- Napoleon Hill- discussed sexuality and it's role in motivation in life. Based on this perhaps it could be unrealistic to expect that sexuality can be removed from the work place and other parts of society. You can try to enforce this prohibition on sexuality in the workplace- but I expect that the only thing that is truly practical is to curb its extremes.

Male animals tend to be sexually dominant (often based on displays of strength and aggression) and so it tends to be easier to see male sexuality. The animal limbic brain is part of humans. Genders express their animal natures in different ways- we are not purely beings of logic- nor would many choose to be. Animals also tend to take different roles in animal society. Whether animal behavior can be related to humans is contentious- perhaps due to the political nature of society.

With this in mind labeling male sexual behavior as evil or illegal is perhaps a form of tyranny

One of the reasons for the conflict of identity politics perhaps is the "thought silos" between fields of study.

CM we dare not look under the sheets for comments in this thread, but know surrounding small villages are places not quite so quite.
One known as Paton Place, is not one teen ages should date locals in, another proudly proclaims fathers day there is total confusion.
single men even aged ones get the acid put on them constantly by wedded women,
Stay quite on that theme.
Yes humans, both sexes, act naturally, how however do you think that impacts on hundreds even thousands of not the dads?
What of the fella who is openly sent for a walk when a truck driver visit his wife, should he have the right to such a test?
I am not trying to control our sex habits, but trying resolve a very real legal problem, *why should not the dad suffer*