Merkel, our idiots, and anyone who has promoted AGW and CO2 scaremongering should be made accountable.

Dear Hasbeen,

this was her comment;

“I am not so happy about the new proposals because many member states today do not comply with what they have already promised,” she said “We should first reach the goals we have already set. I don’t think that constantly setting new targets makes sense.”

Fair enough in my book. However given that 40% reduction is a far cry above the 23% Australia was looking to implement then it is hardly things 'coming apart at the seams'.

Nor does 'intense pressure from industry' constitute a denial of the reality of climate change. It simply is nothing more than a political reality that she is facing, one that was far more effective in this country where our largest mining magnate spent millions upon millions of dollars turning normally sensible people like yourself against action on climate change.

Sheep.

Should ScoMo withdraw from the Paris accord?

Hell no, he should simply do what the rest of the world is doing, which is stick to the non-enforceable Paris accord and in reality do pretty much bugger all.

Apparently Morrison is not pulling out of the
Paris agreement. "Our word is our bond."
What Australia will actually do regarding
emissions we have yet to wait and see - however
it seems that our new PM is not going to walk away.
He's behaving like a Prime Minister - not a party-hack
or a seat warmer, and for that we can all be grateful.

He deserves to be Congratulated!

No Foxy, he is behaving like a fool or a coward. Probably the latter.

Either he is stupid enough to believe in the Global Warming scam, so a fool, or does not have the guts to state his case, get out of Paris, & see what the Oz people really think of the scam at the coming election.

Either way, he will have to go.

Craig Kelly has raised the question of emission reduction in agriculture and transport.
It appears that, not just for electricity, we have to reduce what our
cars, trucks, trains, tractors, sheep, cattle have to reduce by 26% !

What sort of a row will erupt when farmers have to reduce their stocks
and replace their tractors and vehicles.
Will a bureaucrat turn up on every farm and tell them to shoot 26%
(50%) of their animals.

The conditions under which this change must occur has not been spoken
about and is very hush hush. Of course general aviation and transport
aviation will also reduce their emissions. Perhaps they will do that
by reducing the number of flights by 26%.
Of course Labour wants to reduce everything by 50%.

I have looked for info on this but it seems well hidden.