The Forum > General Discussion > Should we Tax all Faiths?
Should we Tax all Faiths?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- ...
- 19
- 20
- 21
-
- All
Posted by Philip S, Friday, 17 August 2018 4:13:51 PM
| |
Philip S,
I think the second sentence of my post above yours sums up what I think about that. The church luvvies are just virtue signalling to attract people who hate them, the poor, simple fools. Top offenders are the Uniting Church and the low Church of England. The Salvos? Not sure that I regard them as a religious domination, but they are well thought of for their help to Australians, and I think that they should stick to that. I know many people who have stopped donating to the Salvos because they don't want their money going to illegal entrants or faux refugees. Posted by ttbn, Friday, 17 August 2018 4:49:15 PM
| |
I can be a smarty at times, in truth we all can, but please tell me, is it ok to impose tax on the average workers but not a Church he/she does not believe in? can we separate the faiths we like but think the faith we do not like are fair game? what is the purpose of tax if it is not to pay for the things we all use or in the case of welfare may/will use? then why should some who make huge sums not pay, is it ok for true not for profits, usually in some way in the service of the community to not pay tax, in my view yes it is ok Churches surely, with massive bank accounts should return some of it to those in need
Posted by Belly, Friday, 17 August 2018 5:41:37 PM
| |
Belly,
I get it. You dislike religion and want to punish it by taxing the churches. But you are determined to avoid the implications of that change of policy in that a lot of other groups will be caught up in your vendetta. BTW, you want to tax all faiths. Define faith. Christian of coarse. Islam? Hindi? Buddhist? Gaia worship? Jedi? The tax act could become quite voluminous and quite philosophical. Posted by mhaze, Friday, 17 August 2018 5:41:39 PM
| |
My thoughts:
Should a person be taxed on gifts? Say if I gave you $100 Belly, do you think you should pay tax on that gift? Likewise, if you gave me $100, should I pay tax on your gift? I think if you or I want to give each other money the government need not take a cut. So overall I think if people want to give their money away it's their business, and there's no need for the government to be double dipping on monies already earned. I probably have more an issue with people blindly following certain flawed and illogical belief systems without instead just learning ethics and staying better grounded. Posted by Armchair Critic, Friday, 17 August 2018 8:04:43 PM
| |
Dear Belly,
Where would we be without Vinnies, The Salvation Army, Father Riley's - Youth Off The Streets, to name just a few religious charities. These organisations represent Religion at its best. According to The Guardian (link given below) - "The high court of Australia states for church bodies to qualify as religious institutions the church body must: be instituted for promotion of a religious object; its activities must reflect that character; and its practices and conduct must not offend against the laws of Australia." A former Assistant Taxation Commissioner Terry Hamilton points out that "The Royal Commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse found more than 4,000 children were sexually abused in 1,691 different institutions, including 2,489 children sexually abused in 964 religious institutions managed by the Catholic Church." Lets also not forget that Cardinal Pell's trial will be coming up shortly. "The associated crimes in these cases break the taxation law obligations that must result in a forfeit of tax exemptions and the registration of tax-exempt charities." The tax exemptions costs Australia over 30 billion dollars a year - and there is no transparency or accountability required. This needs to change. Especially in the cases of charities who may discriminate according to their religious convictions - for example - refusing care and aid to gay people? We are a secular state - shouldn't church and state be separate? Especially with institutions that have a great deal of explaining to do. http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/aug/18/churches-should-lose-charity-status-over-child-abuse-former-tax-head-says Posted by Foxy, Friday, 17 August 2018 8:43:11 PM
|
You may be right but you may be wrong, remember when the boats were coming the charities that includes some church charities wanted the government to bring them all here so they could help them they stood to get multi millions of dollars to do so.
Charities get lots of money to look after refugees.
Going back somewhere like 30 years the Catholic church was the biggest business in the world, even owned Kraft so if they any church has profit based businesses that should be taxed otherwise it gives them an advantage over similar businesses in private hands.
Get Rid of Money Quote "We should make everything free." Stupid statement, if you give everything away for free what idiot is going to work to make it in the first place?