Paul, say what you like about these guys.
I know very little about the two men in the discussion, but I do know that I hate little miss two dads, with a passion.
She is typical of the 'females' I speak of.
Whenever I have the misfortune of seeing that thing all I see is a mouth espewing some of the most useless comments on the planet.
She dares to believe that she has the smarts to run a country.
It is precisely because of things like her that we are going around in circles.
What a low life taking cheap shots then crying foul when she has been called out and put down and back in her box(place).
Paul, you should be ashamed of yourself for sticking up for this vial thing.
The reason I applaud Bolt and all men, is because we have finally admitted 'openly' that we have allowed this kind of disease to spread unchecked.
I'm not sure what makes your kind of male tick.
Men do not hate women only the females.
Everything those six actors said in the advertisement in question by Bolt, should be taken seriously, not sarcastically.
It has been the subject of many papers and studies, that men are the protectors of women, amongst a myriad of other factors that for some reason females find objectionable.
So Paul, are you a man or a male.
If your a man you still have all the qualities it takes to be a good man.
If your a male, your only focused on the bits that are specified by the females and not the women, who BTW make up the 'real' majority of the population.
So it seems your backing the losers.

Whatever our personal feelings - towards Senator
Sarah Hanson Young and Senator David Leyonhjelm we need
to look at the facts of this particular case. Senator
Leyonhjelm incorrectly claimed that Senator Sarah Hanson
Young had said that "all men are rapists."

Senator Leyonhjelm then called out across the chamber that
Senator Hanson-Young should "stop shagging men," and when
Senator Hanson-Young asked, "What did you say?" Leyonhjelm
told her to "F-off." Thereby in his foul-mouthed phrases
Senator Leyonhjelm turned a debate about the safety of women
into a sleazy political side-show.

And if that was not enough, he proceeded to repeat his comments
in a series of media interviews, including one on Sky News
that prompted an apology from the network and its presenters.
Leyonhjelm is claiming that this abuse is normal Australian
behaviour. It may well be in his circles. But as a Senator he
should have known better. He has refused to apologise despite
being asked by everyone from the Senate president to the
Prime Minister.

Various commentators have pointed out that it is sobering to
reflect on the worst consequences of disrespectful attitudes
towards women.

We had the shocking rape and murder of Eurydice Dixon in Melbourne
last month which gave rise to the debate in which Senator
Leyonhjelm made his disgraceful interjection and it rightly led
to an outpouring of community outrage and grief.

The 2018 Report of the Australian Domestic and Family Violence
Death Review Network which draws on data from all coroner
courts in Australia stated that between July 1st 2010 and June
30 2014 there were 152 intimate partner homicides across
Australia that followed an identifiable history of domestic
violence. Of these 121 or 79.6% were women killed by men.

Senator Hanson Young is giving Senator Leyonhjelm a week to
apologise then she will be taking legal action if he doesn't
apologise and she will be donating the proceeds should she win
to women's charities. It is a shame that all this could have
been avoided with a simple apology from Senator Leyonhjelm.
But perhaps he wants to milk this for all its worth.

You all leave "Sea Patrol" Sarah alone, we need her to provide some much- needed humour in politics

Foxy, your showing your bias again. You deliberately over state things to help you TRY to make your case.
Such as, where this all began.
She DID say MEN, meaning ALL MEN.
DL, rightly disgusted and provoked by this excrement espewing from her mouth, responded in kind.
The level or tone of the comments was initiated by little miss foul mouth.
At the very least I don't expect a woman to come up with such unsubstantiated accusations on such a generalised wording as 'men'.
A more intelligent person would have qualified and directed their comment more acutely and said, 'some' men.
To which no one, not even I would dare challenge her.
But no, then she commits another ignorant fopar and brings it out into the public arena.
Had she left it in the 'house', it would have not gotten any oxygen, because this is part of normal parliamentary debate.
If you disagree with this fact then you really SHOULD get out more.
It is she who is milking this for all it's worth.
Foxy how can you not see that this does not help his cause, but hers. Also Foxy stop using the unfortunate deaths of women to bolster your feeble attempts at point scoring, it's demeaning, and crass.
Your backing this vial thing only puts you at odds with reality.
She is pushing it because she stupidly thinks this is going to get her sympathy and political mileage.
It is in fact going to see her lose her arse at the next election.
Her and her performance have been trash and the voters will see her for what she is, opportunistic.
DL did exactly what any man would do by firstly not suffering fools.
Especially in Parliament.
She on the other hand might represent her female followers, but thank God, she does not represent the majority who are the women.
The women see right through her, so no points there.
Foxy, I might applaud you for being a staunch believer in 'the perfect world', but I'm sorry, (and I mean it).
It is NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN.

ALTRAV,

A chi parla poco, gli basta la meta del cervello.

not bias Foxy said the truth the man needs to gather other bigots to him to get re elected SHY was right in calling him out, however SHY is always making outrageous statements and along with the NSW communist woman hiding in the greens is more harm than good for her party