Good. Great idea.

ttbn,

" When the Empire finished, the only countries included in a 'special' relationship should have been the U.K, Australia, New Zealand and Canada."

What about South Africa, an original member from 11 December 1931?
What about Northern Ireland?

Would you let the Channel Islands in?

Dear ttbn,

I doubt if the question of "heredity" was ever at risk as
far as Prince Charles is concerned. Although
the rules of succession have been changed somewhat not
so long ago to allow for girls being able to succeed,
it did not affect Prince Charles. See the link
given below, even
though he may eventually end up being one of the oldest
heirs to the throne or he may even step aside and pass it on
to the next in line if he has to wait too long. The indications
appear though that his mother may be thinking of passing on the
baton to her son sooner than later.

Anyway, it must have been rather comforting to him to have
such a public acknowledgement from his mother considering
the speculations in the media in the past about his son
Prince William's popularity and him being the preferred king.
His mother's public acknowledgement would have been a very
comforting booster.

As for who should have been in the Commonwealth? That decision
should have been made when the organisation of
Britain was being formulated - as to whom to include in their
colonies. It's a bit late now to exclude anyone.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3856958/next-in-line-throne-prince-charles-king-kate-meghan-children/

Hasbeen - Quote "He has actually been taken in by the global warming scam" Because a percentage of his portfolio has money invested with companies that will benefit from the global warming scam.

Is Mise,

No. None of those; I didn't leave anyone out.

ttbn,

Then why your choices?

That's what puzzles me.

I'd have the Channel Islands in as they are part of the Islands of Britain.