ttbn,

You're on dubious ground there, in general Hitler's Germany had less restrictive laws than the Weimar Republic, although his laws did target some specific groups.

Is Mise,

You are always asking others for proof of what the say. Where is your proof?

ttbn,

Try Sopes,
http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/disarm.asp
then if that's not enough just Google Hitler's gun laws.

There's a mess of stuff on Google.

Look we have a clever dick! This bloke can do maths to the seventh decimal place "Deaths by gun were 0.0043403%", and he even knows where to put the percent symbol, yes a very clever dick indeed.

In typical selfish gunnie fashion the deaths of innocent children at the hands of a fellow gunnie, and I put them all in the same category, is reduced to a mere statistic, in their view insignificant, negligible, of little consequence! ttbn, try telling that one to the families of those children who were slaughtered by another crazed gunnie. Wake up fool!

Paul,

He was putting it in perspective, and that is permissible.

Not like the Greens waiting for a tragedy and then rushing in to score political points without regard for the grieving families.

Funny that the Greens and other antis had a word to say about the biggest mass killing in a school in recent history nor about the second worst.
They didn't call for stricter gun laws in the countries concerned.

Issy, fiddling with numbers like this to put it into so called "perspective" is what I would term an insensitive cop out. You might think it is permissible, I don't agree. If every gunnie in Australia turned his gun on himself, what percentage of the population would we loose, not much, and we could keep it quite out of respect for the dead. Agree?

In typical gunnie fashion, when one of their deranged members goes off, and a mass killing occurs, other gunnies like Issy want it hushed up, not mentioned, out of respect for the dead! What a joke.

Hitlers gun laws couldn't have been too tough, the bloke shot himself dead