ttbn, "why don't you get together a class action and take Colebatch to court"
Class action, for what purpose, and for what group? I do not see the need.

Looks like with you being so willing to accept anything the far right comes up with, like that other poser ALTRAV on another thread, fell for the three card trick, blindly believing what you are fed. Bad mistake

Is Mise

I'm not interested enough to prove you wrong. If anything, you should do the proving as you are the one making accusations against a well known author, but I am not expecting you to do that.

As for Google, haven't you been reading lately of the censoring, blocking and anti-conservative attitudes of Google? I have never heard of a Vultee Vengeance, but that's not he point.

The point is that you have accused Colebatch of being wrong (the nice word for it). You have no real proof. I'm sure that I would find what you found in Google, but that might be wrong, too.

A bit late in the day, I know, but have you actually read “Australia's Secret War”, or are you merely going on what Google says or what book critics have said? I wonder, too, if Paul has read it.

If you and Paul don't have the confidence to take the 'court' option, how about submitting an article to Graham, fleshing out your problems with with the book. Hal might even see it and want to reply to you accusations. You could think about writing to him via the publisher, voicing your concerns. He might even concede some things to you.

I'm all for revealing untruths, if they exist. I have just finished reading two books exposing fraud – the multicultural fraud, the fraud of Martin Luther King, the fraud of Afrocentrist theories of ancient history just to name a few. Good stuff.

But, I have to say that I cannot stomach claims from anonymous people – who can't be made to front up – relying on Google and Wikipedia for 'proof'.

Still, as the book has been around for 5 years, whatever is said about it now is pretty irrelevant.

ttbn, don't bother. They don't want to hear anything which might dilute their extreme left, labor/union/commo stance.

They speak of their having been around these people as if that gives them insights as to what they did or were thinking.

Their argument about proof is also a deflection because any treasonous clandestine actions of any kind, are never documented or reported. Only a fool would record it and an even bigger fool would request it.

I have been tussling with Philips and his mates on another thread, to the point where I made my case, won the argument and moved on. Only to find him still bleating on here with his followers.

I gave 'first hand' accounts of some of these acts of treason in the form of my own father-in-law and how he came close to death and had to be shipped out only to have half his stomach removed. All because of these labor, union, commo loving bastards.

They are so far left they refuse to accept any blame for these acts of treason during the war.

What best explains the mentality of these types is, they admire someone they have barely seen from afar and know nothing about, yet they will reject a submission by someone who was there and suffered by the hand of these commo pigs. I won't mince words, if the shoe fits.

You are quite right in your backing Colebatch.

Why would he even begin to write on that topic if there was not at least enough truth and proof to make it over the line of reason?

I have quoted a real person, who was there, and suffered directly as a result of the direct actions of these pigs.

So ttbn, if I sound pissed off with people who 'don't want to hear' the truth, because of some stupid arrogant beliefs in some sick moronic, political party/union/commo loving anti Australians, I will not shy away and will always go on the attack.

I'll say it again; The unions/labor are an insidious, influence on us, our democracy and our future in general.

Is Mise,

The evidence is I'm afraid mounting against Colebatch's
book. Here's another link that explains the errors in it:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-11/stanley-australias-secret-and-unhistorical-war/5960090

Foxy,

Your reference is 4 years old. It's all old stuff dug up by an apparently bored Is Mise. For something new, have a look at the Domain study that came with your email notification of new posts. It tells us that we are getting more polarised and snakeY in online discussion, although we probably knew that without the effort of doing a 'study'.

ttbn,

I still have high hopes that no matter what the
subject or the issue we can learn from each other.
I used to be so dogmatic in my views, as I get older
I'm beginning to realise that I've still got a lot
to learn. I'm still on my journey of discovery - and
this I trust will always be the case.