The Forum > General Discussion > Oprah Winfrey for President?
Oprah Winfrey for President?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- ...
- 10
- 11
- 12
-
- All
Posted by Loudmouth, Monday, 15 January 2018 11:57:06 AM
| |
ttbn,
Actually, the term "Bimbo" initially came into being in the United States in 1919 and referred to an unintelligent or brutish male. So it does suit the current US President. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bimbo As for Chelsea Manning? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelsea_Manning I would not be leaping to her defence so quickly if I were you. Posted by Foxy, Monday, 15 January 2018 12:07:16 PM
| |
The Clintons are ominously silent. Popcorn anyone?
Posted by leoj, Monday, 15 January 2018 12:35:00 PM
| |
Foxy,
Well, there you are, anything but boring!! How about Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, John Adams and his son John Quincy Adams? None of them boring by a long shot. Posted by Is Mise, Monday, 15 January 2018 1:16:34 PM
| |
James Kunstler recently wrote;
"Politics has become entertainment and entertainment has become politics !" Posted by Bazz, Monday, 15 January 2018 2:55:52 PM
| |
Foxy,
Where did I say I would defend Manning? He she or it is a disgrace. As for, 'bimbo', I can't say for sure that the Wikipedia entry is wrong, but the site has often been abused by people making stuff up, as you will be aware. As the term is generally used these days to refer to a blonde female, my use of it for the lady in question was wrong, and as she didn't put herself up as a possible presidential candidate, I should have confined my criticism to the to Trump-hating weirdos who did suggest it. Posted by ttbn, Monday, 15 January 2018 4:30:54 PM
|
Trump. Oprah. Manning. None of the above. Surely the American people, 350 million of them, can come up with someone better ?
Joe