cont'd ...

My apologies for the typo regarding the Don Burke link.

Here it is again:

http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/celebrities-gone-bad/can-i-lick-your-back-the-allegations-against-don-burke/news-story/adea300bd3890276a10aeaf2227a365c

Even if it is forgotten that you are looking through a prism of 2017 and the allegations against Don Burke are accepted at face value (Burke denies the allegations), what you two examples demonstrate is how seriously in the present day the law, employers and the public view any alleged sexual harassment at work and the very serious consequences for any offender and the organisation involved.

Now, what about this? {lift the eye patch]
"In the West there is a double standard though. Where for instance a celebrity lesbian can ogle and pass public comments about a young women's bust and it is apparently OK for her to do that and to use the target of her lust to express her sexuality. All in front of her partner too, which ordinarily if it were a white heterosexual male as the offender, give rise to a host of other criticisms relating to abuse of power, patriarchy and so on."

https://www.maxim.com/entertainment/ellen-degeneres-katy-perry-boobs-2017-10

'reported sexual assaults' and the UN'

A red herring. And to mix metaphors, garbage in and garbage out.

Foxy's left feminist orthodoxy that demonises white Australian men through fudged 'statistics' (sic) and sloppy 'research' has been dispelled numerous times before on this forum. It is all about millions of dollars of taxpayers money being spent on feminist publicity and propaganda campaigns. With very little of that money ever reaching the alcohol and drug affected and the Aborigines where the incidence of violence is prevalent.

http://www.bettinaarndt.com.au/media-resources/videos/talking-australias-anti-male-culture/

Last sentence should be, "With very little of that money ever reaching the alcohol and drug affected and the Aborigines where the violence is prevalent".

I can't understand why someone who has spoken out about
a female's right to say no to anal sex and carried on
about this issue so strongly on various posts in the
past should now be in denial about sexual harassment
of women taking place when there is so much evidence
available as to what is really going on in this country.
Was all this previous "outrage" in defense of women
false? One can't help but wonder about the credibility
of this poster.Or anything that he posts. He appears to follow
whatever opinion is in fashion. (or thinks it is).
Sad really.

Here's another link on the subject:

http://www.smh.com.au/national/survey-reveals-how-widespread-sexual-harassment-is-in-australia-20171107-gzgvpz.html

As for Don Burke's denials? Well, As Mandy-Rice Davies once
said - "He would, wouldn't he!"

Foxy,

Your are as usual trying to divert the thread. Because the game is up for the ARHC that is seen to be empire building and relying on very broad definitions and sloppy feminist research, and of course the obvious diversion of the millions of taxpayers dollars into propaganda campaigns and hollow shams. The money doesn't reach the Aboriginals, alcohol and drug-affected, or the culturally driven imports who feature strongly in violence against women, against one another and society in fact, gender is often irrelevant.

I don'y usually respond to forum bait and I realise some here like to drag people into the muddy end of the swamp. But on this occasion the issue is important and should be covered so here goes.

As the forum's No1 advocate for Gays and concentrating almost exclusively on male homosexual rights as you have over many years - one of your main themes - of course you could be expected to be proselytising for the normalising of anal sex and for diminishing the risks for women, and scoffing at their distaste and resistance to it.

However there are many such as myself who have drawn attention to increasing concerns from medical authorities and others about the number of girls and young women (mature women too!) who are being manipulated by strong emotional blackmail and bullied into sex acts, particularly anal sex, that they do not invite, do not want and serves NO good for their bodies and mental and emotional welfare

The risks extend from the leaky bum, which no girl or young woman would want, to a range of potentially serious effects, STIs and some life threatening. The boys and men who are putting their risky, often bare-back (they may slip that condom off) thrill-seeking before the welfare and informed consent of their victims are encouraged and supported by the normalisation of such behaviour, anal sex particularly, in pornography and in movies, by Hollywood.