The Forum > General Discussion > Anti SSM On A Par With Racism
Anti SSM On A Par With Racism
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Page 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- ...
- 44
- 45
- 46
-
- All
Posted by AJ Philips, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 12:38:37 AM
| |
Foxy, Do you believe politicians who wish to remove religious freedoms.
Penny Wong? http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/2017/05/17/religion-still-standing-in-the-way-of-marriage-equality-senator_a_22094895/ Posted by Josephus, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 7:31:14 AM
| |
//Do you believe politicians who wish to remove religious freedoms.
Penny Wong?// She doesn't want to remove religious freedoms. Did you even read the article, or did you take one look at the picture of a gay Labor politician and just assume what was written? "At the centre of the opposition to equality of marriage rights for gay and lesbian members of the community is the conflation of religious concepts of marriage with secular concepts of marriage," she said. "Religious attitudes to marriage continue to impact on much of the political debate that has delayed the recognition of the marriage equality rights of the gay and lesbian community. "The problem in all of this, of course, is the application of religious belief to the framing of law in a secular society. And in societies where church and state are constitutionally separate." "Religious freedom means being free to worship and to follow your faith without suffering persecution or discrimination for your beliefs. It does not mean imposing your beliefs on everyone else." Posted by Toni Lavis, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 7:42:09 AM
| |
What is happening in UK to remove free speech and religious conviction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRG-_ifkxM8 Posted by Josephus, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 7:44:56 AM
| |
//What is happening in UK to remove free speech and religious conviction.//
Letting the British PM make speeches at a gay awards night? WTF? How does that have anything to do with removing religious freedoms? Posted by Toni Lavis, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 8:04:13 AM
| |
Dear Josephus,
We shall all know the results of the postal survey soon enough. It closes today. And you just may find out that your fears and concerns were really unwarranted. Dwell on that instead and stay calm. Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 9:42:32 AM
|
”BS most homosexual choose the lifestyle” (http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=19387#344538)
“Homosexuality is a choice...” (http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=3098#3604)
“I am glad to see that you admit that people committing sodomy as well as sleeping with women is a choice.” (http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=6073#174851)
“All actions are a choice … there has never been a scientific study done that proves that homosexuality is genetic” (http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=5025#58747)
“… the negative long term social implications of particular sexual choices, (yes.. thats what I said -'choices') …” (http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=1308#23327)
“Just don't shove your lifestyle choice … down the throat of 98% of the general population…” (http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=13374#231397)
“… so a small percentage are able to destroy normality to suit their own personal unnatural lifestyle choices.” (http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=1308#24728)
Then along you come, talking about a “lifestyle choice” in the same breath as the “homosexual community”:
“… HIV/AIDS would have already wiped out most of the homosexual community and left that lifestyle choice as something few would choose.” (http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=7994#247597)
Yet, according to you, it was just me distorting what you had said, and everyone else would have known that you were actually talking about promiscuity.
Yeah, right.