Joe,
C'mon your better than that. Where did I suggest that lesbians engage in MORE anal sex than others? I took it, from TL's question that she was saying that lesbians have high morals and could not possibly engage in anything anal.

AJ,
You do like lying and putting your own spin on what other posters write don't you.

The fact remains that dirty sexual practices is the reason for homos having such a poor public image. They should be made to call their union anything but marriage, to protect the status of marriage. Why not simply UNION? That word is not associated with anything wholesome.

Dear Banjo,

You wrote;

“I do not have a fixation on anything anal”

Well that most certainly is in the eye of the beholder and from where I am sitting you definitely do.

And then this from you;

“Are you trying to tell everyone that lesbians do not engage in anal sex, either with tongue, fingers, strap on or dildo.”

Look mate, I'm not sure what kind of porn you are into but you do realise that most of it is highly exaggerated. Once again I will admit I'm a little loathed to put words like “lesbian anal and dildo' into my favourite search engine but I shouldn't have to, you have made the assertion so how about backing it up.

Finally I would remind you that you still appear not to have answered my question to you;

“So the obvious question based on your stated criteria my old dear is whether you consider the marriages of heterosexual couples who engage in anal sex to be invalid? Further would you support the marriage between two homosexual man who did not practice anal sex?”

Banjo.

So, when Joe interprets what you had said as implying that lesbians engage in anal play more often than heterosexual couples, he should know better; but when I interpret your words in the same way, I'm lying and putting my own spin on what you're saying?

<<You do like lying and putting your own spin on what other posters write don't you.>>

You cited anal intercourse as a reason for opposing same-sex marriage; Toni pointed out that this does not explain your opposition to lesbians getting married; you then responded by pointing out that lesbians, too, can engage in such activities.

Therefore, either you think lesbians engage in anal play more often than heterosexual women, or you're also against the marriages of heterosexual couples who engage in anal intercourse. Since you don't speak out against the marriages of heterosexual couples who engage in anal intercourse, I can only presume it's the former.

You don't get to call me a liar just because because I exposed one of your fellow SSM opponent's lies recently. It's an accusation which needs to be reserved for times when you can actually demonstrate the truth of your claim, not something you accuse people of willy-nilly just because you don't like what they've said.

Hi AJ,

Being from Western Sydney, I've lead a relatively sheltered life, unaware of all that kinky and perverted stuff (are we still allowed to use that word ?) that we knew was going on over on the North Shore. But I frankly don't believe that either heterosexual couples OR lesbians ever did anal sex much. For all I know, maybe only a minority of homosexual men (can I this naive ?) do it either - most of us, heterosexual and homo, simply find face-to-face sex vastly more fulfilling and sociable.

For all that, I still voted NO. Wind marriage down if anything, I say, for those heterosexuals (a man and a woman) who feel it is vital to cement their lifelong relationship. God, I wish the Gramscians would get onto real issues.

Joe

In the thread, "HIV Why isn't the message getting through on anal sex?" From a declared lesbian poster, who would know one would suppose,

"Also I got something shocking to tell you buddy. I know plenty of gay women whom enjoy anal sex and they aren’t coerced into it by anyone, man, woman or otherwise. They enjoy it and if you don’t then you can not do it, that’s your choice but again if we’re going to use sexuality and risk of sexually transmitted diseases as a compass for moral superiority Lesbians still win"
Posted by Zeil, Monday, 10 April 2017 3:50:36 PM

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=7720&page=0#237580

Some of the posters in the present thread were also involved in that thread and should be aware.

"Speaking of unsupported assertions, I can’t believe I missed this doozy from mhaze"

Translation: I can't believe I failed to see how I could distort what mhaze said.

Read the next sentence from my post...." Modern medicine makes promiscuous homosexual behaviour possible."

The promiscuous homosexual lifestyle of multiple anonymous partners, the bath house culture, the mardi gras culture...these are choices. Equally the decision to partake in penetrative homosexual activities is a choice.

Without the help of modern western medicine these lifestyles would be deadly, or more deadly.

Its interesting to ponder how many times over the millennia societies have allowed this type of activity to expand only to find, sans modern medicine, that those participating in it fall victim to nature's abhorrence of the activity. In the same way that societies develop taboos around other dangerous practices (eg the Semitic taboo against pork) perhaps this proclivity for homosexual disease explains why pretty much every culture has a taboo against sticking your dick up someone else's anus.

And it doesn't take long for these problems to arise. Gays were barely out of the closet before they found themselves in the HIV ward. And now we find the growing (but silenced) problem of of anal cancer arising. How long will it be before the gay community demands that funds be diverted to address that problem?