The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML

RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > UNESCO Loses U.S Support

UNESCO Loses U.S Support

  1. Pages:
  2. ‹
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. Page 5
  8. 6
  9. 7
  10. ›
  11. All
As for the 'slyly removed condom': Jesus, leoj, why on Earth would you do that? Of all the bizarre, nonsensical things I've heard from you... it would be like me pouring concentrated acid in the lab and deciding halfway through to take off my safety goggles. WTF? I mean yeah, I can see cowboys who aren't worried about safety ignoring safety goggles completely, but I can't see anybody having some sort of epiphany halfway through and throwing caution to the winds at that point.

//and frankly how many men comply with the standard instructions for use?//

Any with any sense. You don't appear to realise that it is possible for men to be infected by women who are carrying STI's.

Remember, leoj: She may look clean - but you can't beat the Axis if you get VD.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/06/10/article-2339094-1A3EC701000005DC-922_634x827.jpg

//Why shouldn't girls be raised to expect to be shown a recent clear test?//

Why shouldn't men?

You're starting to sound an awful like some feminists, leoj. How long until you sign up for Emily's list?
Posted by Toni Lavis, Saturday, 14 October 2017 7:12:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I had a bit a wry smile at some of these replies - just thinking about the regular stories of condoms that don't fit and the efforts being made by manufacturers to remedy that and encourage proper use ie in full compliance with the instructions.

I do not believe that a condom replaces 'No!' where the risk consequence to the woman could be serious harm or death.
Posted by leoj, Saturday, 14 October 2017 7:59:47 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I remember read a while ago that for every $1 than UNESCO gets, only 5c actually goes to those that need it. The organisation is stuffed with bureaucrats that are largely there for the kudos and spends vast amounts of money on meetings etc.

The managers are voted in based on connections and favours and has nothing to do with their contributions. It is why the head of the UNHCR is a Saudi Prince.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Sunday, 15 October 2017 3:08:39 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The U.S. military budget is $824.6 billion . Only a small percentage gets to North Korea.
Posted by nicknamenick, Sunday, 15 October 2017 3:50:02 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Nick,

I'm sure that North Korea will be getting its fair share of the US military budget soon.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Monday, 16 October 2017 8:41:08 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Either that or Trump joins Paris agreement , Criminal Court ,
UNESCO and free trade and cuts all weapon deliveries into Pyongyang. Iran will be easier to supply with radiation.
Posted by nicknamenick, Monday, 16 October 2017 10:19:52 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. ‹
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. Page 5
  8. 6
  9. 7
  10. ›
  11. All
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy