' The protesters despite
being vocal did not exhibit any level of aggression
or violence. '

no as far as Foxy is concerned the burning down of a house and then smashing up of a court house and several police injured is not violence because its from the left. And of course no one charged for burning down house. What a surprise. Foxy demonstrates clearly how her lying narrative keeps aboriginals poor except for those involved in the industry.

Dear Shadow Minister,

I don't use sarcasm. I state facts .

If you want to dispute what is being presented kindly
provide evidence that contradicts what I am finding.

A 14 year old boy was blatantly (and fatally) run over
in Kalgoorlie in 2016. I believe that protests took
place AFTER the court verdict was delivered.

In any other situation if it was an Indigenous man who
ran over a white child he would have been charged with
manslaughter minimum.

Does this not resonate with you SM?

Runner,

Please provide evidence to back your theories.
Otherwise your childish tactics of insults and
ad hominem attacks will not be taken seriously.

Foxy,

You have admitted that the account of the ute driver is the only evidence available yet are the one posting as "fact" something that is not supported in any form or fashion. Your facts are conjecture and fantasy.

Secondly, that the protests became more vociferous and violent after the judgement and sentencing is not in dispute, but to claim that there were no protests before the judgement is a blatant falsehood.

Finally, if an Aboriginal man had pursued a 14yr old criminal fleeing with his property and accidentally killed him, the verdict probably would be the same. Claiming otherwise is once again pure conjecture and fantasy.

Dear Shadow Minister,

What I have presented is neither conjecture nor
fantasy. The information is available freely on
the web.

Cheers.

Foxy,

The only facts you have presented contradict your conjecture that the driver forced the thief to veer. And having trawled through the topic, I have found several left whinge blogs that make the same assertion with the same complete lack of evidence.

For example, I believe that Elijah with some of his mates personally stole the bike based on the circumstances and his past record. However, I don't assert it as fact.

Dear Shadow Minister,

What I assert as fact - came out of the mouth of the
driver who has admitted that Elijah would not have
been killed had he not been driving so close to him.
That the accident would not have happened. And there's
more, but we've already covered that ground. I've told
you this information is on the web. It is not something
that I am making up. Whether you believe it or not - is
not my problem, but yours. And as for "Lefty sites?"
I don't regard the ABC as a "Lefty" site. But as I said -
that's your problem, not mine.

Have a nice day.