There is no need for the mahommedeans to worry. It was only a Lone Wolf attack.

Steel
No I did not bend over backwards to defend his rights--
I pointed out that the he had the rights to write those letters and
could not be prosecuted.
Nowhere did I say I approved of him writing them !
I defended the rights we have for free speech.

You knew that from everything else I wrote but you chose that typical
lefty technique to twist it.

Mhaze yes I agree with your comments.
I have suggested that a few times; put an electronic wall around the
middle east, no one in, no one out and only ME Arabs and moslems etc
allowed to return.

Tell them 1400 years of attacks from Arabs and Persians is enough.
There is a video I cannot find that talks about the 800 plus battles
with attacking Islamic armies in Europe !
Mohammed ordered his followers to conquer Rome.
In their context Rome means Europe.
I asked some relatives, schoolteachers, if they could tell me which
European capitals had been attacked and or occupied by moslem armies.
They knew about Madrid and Athens but that was it.
They did not know about Budapest, Zagreb, Bucharest, Rome, Berne,
Sarajevo, Bratislava etc being occupied.
They attacked Vienna two or three times and their last defeat at
Vienna was with the help of the Polish army.
They occupied Sicily for a few hundred years I think but were trurfed
out when a real western army turned up, namely the Normans. of 1066 fame.
They almost reached where Paris is now but were defeated at Tours.

Put all this in context and you might have a better understanding
what is going on and why Islam is intent on attacking Europe.
Look for the great siege of Malta

ttbn,

I don't agree that we should " get rid of them". They're here, they're often citizens, we invited them. Our problem isn't with 'them', its with that portion of them who are, or will become, radicalised. It is here that our efforts need to be made. By all means don't add to the potential pool by adding to the overall pool but don't expel those who are here.

"Immigration from Commonwealth countries only". Again, I'm not thrilled by that. If we have to have an immigration policy then we ought to take the best from anywhere. As an example, Jews are leaving France like its Berlin 1934 due to islamic pressures and soft governmental antisemitism. I've often thought we should make a special offer to these people for 'asylum'. That I'd tweek French noses is an added bonus.

Bazz,

You wrote:
"Mhaze said;
We (Australia) have lesser problems due to sensible decisions

Not really, the only reason we have lessor problems is because the
Muslim population is 2.2%, not the 10% + in Eurabia."

Keeping the Muslim population low was indeed the sensible decisions I was talking about. That and the moves made by Hawke in the 80s which meant that we didn't feel the need to import a generation of taxpayers to cover the pension plans offered to the native population.

Just on your historic summary of Islamic conflict. When Mohamed talked about 'Rome' he likely meant Constantinople which had been from the outset thought of as new Rome. At that time the Byzantines still thought of themselves as Romans.
And Rome was never occupied by the Muslim armies. They got to the outskirts but the Aurelian Walls held.

Mhaze maybe, but the actions of the Islamic armies and pirates in
the Mediterranean in the 100 years after were not that selective.
By the way St Peters was outside the Aurelian Walls.
One of the local U3As is starting a semester on Roman History next
month so I might go to that and learn some more Roman history.

Mhaze, I have found that video that I mentioned.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y

A very interesting historian. He explains a lot about the Islamic invasions.
It puts so much into perspective.
I have started to watch it again, it needs to be repeated because there
is so much data in it.