Banjo,

Both posts, well said.

Thanks too to phanto, for this gem of a post, page 7,
phanto, Thursday, 1 June 2017 1:49:19 PM

Just noticed a query from Foxy:

"EJ,

You wrote - "That lying Moslem woman."

How exactly did she lie?"

She lied on Q&A that Islam was a feminist religion that respected women. Senator Lambie called her out on it but the liar was professionally trained and Senator Lambie had not done her homework on Islam (as anyone who can read should be doing and keeping up to date as it is a Fifth Column imported into our country, including its misogyny and bigotry on steroids).

Dear EJ,

I believe that she was explaining Islam
according to her own religious
beliefs. Therefore does that constitute a lie?
I'm not sure that it does. But, Thank You for your
explanation.

Now back to the topic - regarding her ANZAC Day
comments, the outrage she caused, and the demands
for her to be sacked.

"It is important to remember Yassmin Abdel Magied's
comments were not made when she was actually
presenting on the ABC."

"Are the critics saying that the ABC must be responsible
for the views expressed in other forums by anyone who
might be a part-time presenter?"

"Critics are always insisting the ABC should have more
conservative presenters. If more conservatives are
appointed to present one or more programs, should what they
said elsewhere follow ABC guidelines and be under strict
ABC control? Hardly."

"In terms of the content of Abdel Magied's post, vocal
advocates of removing restraints (notably 18C of the Racial
Discrimination Act) to promote "Free Speech" can't object
when someone speaks out."

"The fact that a remark is considered disrespectful
(or insensitive) or against Australian values is hardly the
point - or - perhaps it is the point.
The test of your commitment to free speech, a core
Australian value, is when you don't like what's being said."

"Abdel Magied's comment upset many people, but was mild
compared with, for example, some of the dialogue in
Alan Seymour's famous "The One Day of the Year."

"In that play, the young character Hughie declares -
"That whole thing - ANZAC - Gallipoli - was a waste.
Certainly nothing to glorify."

"Wicka Dawson tells Alf, fellow digger and Hughie's father -
"He's got the right, to think and say what he likes.
Any fightin' we did, you 'n' me in any wars, it was to give
him that right."

"Seymour's play written in 1958, caused a furore, including
a bomb scare during a dress rehearsal and death threats to
the author. It went on to be seen as a classic in Australian
writing."

(Michelle Grattan, April 26th 2017 - the conversation.)

http://theconversation.com/abdel-magied-anzac-row-is-a-storm-over-not-much-76708

contd ...

My apologies for the typo. the character Wicka Dawson
should be - Wacka Dawson.

Foxy, she told the audience that Islam was a feminist religion that respects women. She was not expressing a religious belief, she was describing to a non-Moslem audience a religion which quite plainly in its own literature available for anyone who gives a damn to look at ascribes an inferior role to women as part of its general misanthropy. If she was explaining Islam according to her own religious beliefs rather that what its own literature says about it she was engaging in taqiyya (look it up) - a form of lying intended to serve the march of Islam.

The woman was lying.

Try reading http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/taqiyya.aspx which describes taqiyya based on the actual texts of what the Koran and Hadiths say about it. Try taking it on board to avoid the risk of pussyfooting appeasement of an imported Fifth Column.

Dearest Foxy,

So ........ if someone tells a lie, but, with innocent eyes blinking in confusion, says that they thought it as true, that's not a lie. Oh, Right.

Surely she - and probably you as well - are aware that in Islam - a woman's word in court is worth far, far less than a man's ?

Surely she - and probably you as well - are aware that female genital mutilation, hacking out a young girl's labia and clitoris, is a vile practice which is deliberately meant to deprive a woman from ever experiencing the ecstasies that a man is free to experience ?

Surely she - and who knows, maybe you as well - are aware that a woman inherits vastly less than a man-child, and loses far more on divorce, even of the property that she brought to the marriage ?

Surely she knows - and just probably, you as well - know that, on divorce, once a child has been suckled, it goes to the ex-husband, and the now-useless wife, sorry ex-wife, will be thrown out of the family home ? Back to her birth-family, in disgrace, and penniless?

Surely she, and even you possibly, know that woman in Saudi Arabia, i.e. a strictly Islamic country - not a single synagogue or Christian church after all, can't leave the home without a male relative, and only in full tent-garb ? That they can't get a driver's licence ? Or even ride a fb%*uyn43n@ing push-bike ?

And yet she - and just possibly you too - claim that somehow, Islam is a feminist religion.

I don't recall signing up to being a supporter of that sort of feminism. Did you ?

Joe