Billyd and Toni Lavis,

The censorship of migrant crimes in Europe is commonly discussed on the independent media.
We know this because the when the facts aren't reported on by the corporate media in that country the stories then find their way to the independent media which does report on them.
I've heard there are laws now that prevent publishing migrant crimes in either Germany or the EU (can't remember which exactly).
I tried looking up links to justify this claim but I can't find mention of this so-called law at this point; you can either take my word for it, or not, or do some research and find out for yourself.

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/europes-amazing-vanishing-act

http://www.infowars.com/german-police-covering-up-rapes-so-as-not-to-legitimize-critics-of-mass-migration/

http://www.infowars.com/mark-zuckerberg-caught-on-hot-mic-saying-facebook-will-censor-anti-migrant-posts/

http://freebeacon.com/culture/facebook-will-now-censor-fake-news/

http://www.infowars.com/ex-stasi-agent-hired-to-censor-xenophobic-facebook-posts/

Long before the media push against 'fake news' late last year (as evidenced by my links) there was a need by globalists to do something to combat the spread of right-wing nationalist views in western nations.
They had a need for censorship of news critical of immigration and other globalist agendas.
They can't just come out and censor news on such of massive level, they need a crisis to justify their changes, and they also need to 'sell' the idea to 'useful idiots'.
So they say they need to censor 'hate speech' or speech that might 'incite hatred or violence'.
Now they have a basis to which they can label and discredit news organisations or websites critical of their agendas and then persecute them on a seemingly reasonable basis.
It's purpose however in not reducing 'incitement to hatred' its true purpose is censorship of views critical of their globalist agendas.

//The censorship of migrant crimes in Europe is commonly discussed on the independent media.//

See what I mean, BillyD? AC gets his info from Some Bloke on the Internet.

You may have noticed that 60% of his links were to the website of this man:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5KTiAcTEyc

Because we all know how reliable people clearly suffering from mental illness with full blown hallucinations are. I feel sorry for the poor guy, and I hope he's able to get the help he needs.

But because Some Bloke's 'facts' agree with AC's personal biases, he never bothers to question if they are indeed facts, or just the ramblings of a fevered imagination.

Dream on, the march that was to be cancelled was at Katoomba (not sure of the spelling) in the Blue mountains very close to the army baracks.

My problem is our useless policitcally correct government can see fit to charter a flight for relatives of illigals killed at sea, these passangers themselves being illegal arrivals, yet they cant fund security for an iconic march like Anzac day.

As for your comments on indiginous, just thank your lucky stars the majority white strong army fended off the Japs at Darwin, because what happened to them from within was like a holiday camp compared to what the Japs would have done had they succeded with their invation.

What Armchair says is basically correct.
There is no law in most European countries applying censorship as such
but the police come under heavy criticism if they say a crime was
committed by a group of moslem immigrants. They can have their own
superiors come down on them for racism.
That is what happened in the case of Rotherham.

There are also problems with the "Hate Speach" legislation in various countries.
You can be prosecuted for saying moslems are a problem.
Perhaps you never heard of the Geert Wilders case.
He is leader of the 2nd largest party in Holland.
At a political rally he asked the rhetorical question;
"Do you want more or less Moroccans ?" "Less, less, less from the crowd.".

He was prosecuted for that and found guilty.
Penalty, as far as I know reserved to a later date.
I suggest that you search "Blondes Police Norway Sweden" I have not
searched on that search term so I am not certain it will find the
police recommendations. Search Sweden police demonstrations.
The police are resigning because of lack of backup from their senior officers.
Search police and Malmo.
Then tell me I am imagining it.

If you look it goes on & on but you never hear about it here.

Paul,

Second World War, 1939–45 [I imagine that there would be no Greens had we lost]
Occupation of Japan, 1946–51 [wasn't a war and there were very friendly relations with the locals++++++]
Korean War, 1950–53 [ definitely freedom after the North Koreans were put back from whence they had started, are you a fan of the clown that runs North Korea?]
Malayan Emergency, 1950–60 [ definite freedom although Lee Rhiannon's mates in the Communist Party didn't like it.]
Indonesian Confrontation, 1963–66 [you've gotta be jokin']
Vietnam War, 1962–75
[disaster]
First Gulf War, 1990–91 [ditto]
Peacekeeping, 1947 to present [ all in all freedom wins this one particularly East Timor]

Foxy, your admission that stronger measures are being taken to protect societies from extremists and terrorists pretty much backs my claim that we are losing the battle and the extremists are actually winning.

As for extremists being a small minority says nothing as there are far more today than there were twenty years ago, and that's a problem.

The other concern is what percentage of that very small minority make up our total crime and incarceration rates because for example, if they make up 0.1% of the population, yet represent more than 0.1% of crims, then you have a problem.

You see Islam is a movement, and unlike us who have a life span, it doesn't.

The real problem will arrive one day, 5, 10, 20, even 50 years from now when these so called 'moderate Muslims' throughout the world are forced to choose between their country of residence, or their religious leader. That's when the sh1t will hit the fan. People like you make that transition easier, while putting the lives of innocent people at ever increasing risk in their day to day lives, lives that when I was a kid were in no danger what so ever. These are not the type of people we want populating our countries and for me, Muslim immigration should be stopped. I won't say before it's too late, because I believe it's already too late. It is now just a matter of time before they are forced to choose. Hopefully not in my lifetime.