The Forum > General Discussion > land grab
land grab
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
No, the Mission didn't sell guns as far as I can tell. People bought them in the local towns. And as British subjects like everyone else, the thought of some impediment to their right to buy guns wouldn't have arisen.
" .... some Ngarrindjeri need them for duck-shooting .... " Yes, of course. But by the 1890s, whites were devastating the duck populations around the Lakes (i.e. for sale in Adelaide), by using what they called punt-guns, i.e. a punt or flat boat on which a shooter could lie flat and use a sort of semi-machine gun fixed on the bow, and so get up very close and bring down great numbers of birds.
Aboriginal people complained, so the government here banned the use of punt-guns, and passed the Game Act which declared 'closed seasons' for most native animals and set up Game Reserves. Aboriginal people were exempt from the restrictions of 'closed seasons' and could hunt and fish in Game Reserves, provided they did so only for their own consumption and not in order to sell any catches. That's still the law.
And before you jump in and declare that, by allowing people to hunt, fish and gather, governments were treating Aboriginal people like flora and fauna, no, Aboriginal people were allowed to exercise their traditional rights to hunt, fish and gather, no more and no less:
Some dick found out that at one time, the same Minister was responsible for the Environment and for Aboriginal Affairs. Oh, he said, so we're just part of the flora and fauna ? No, dirk-wad, the Minister for Aboriginal affairs is also the Minister for the Environment. Often ministers have multiple portfolios, especially at State level but even at Federal level. Check it out.
Joe