The Forum > General Discussion > Renewables part in South Australia's network collapse
Renewables part in South Australia's network collapse
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Page 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- ...
- 19
- 20
- 21
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Aidan/Bazz, thanks for that info on GTO thyristors and trains, it was new to me. They're not a device I'm familiar with. These days the big work is on high electron mobility transistors, some of which are now capable of carrying currents in the low thousands of amps, which makes them candidates for use in electronic power transformers, not unlike your computer's switch mode power supply on steroids. They're also useful in HVDC, which is growing fast as the technology improves. It's much more efficient in that role than its AC cousin.
Load shedding would not have been an option in the time frame available. It's got to be well planned and precisely carried out or it can cause problems of its own, not to mention that it's highly charged politically. Like the Brisbane floods, I suspect this will have some people in high places looking to "blame" people who were just doing their jobs to the best of their ability, as we're already seeing from one political operative on this site. Also like the Brisbane floods, I suspect it will turn out that what is needed is better decision making at a high level with regard to critical operating choices. The margins of operating safety may need to be increased a little to ensure similar events don't recur.
Wise people learn from events like this, lesser minds run around in circles looking for someone to take the fall and chattering pointlessly about things they don't understand.
Shadow Minister, you're looking increasingly out of your depth. Neither of your last two posts have had any basis in reality.
Now I know you can read and with all those degrees you claim to have I'm sure you're capable of understanding the words you read, so presumably you are deliberately choosing to be misleading and dishonest.
That is why I said you have a "shabby reputation" in an earlier post.