Pauline Hanson was a member of the Liberal party, disendorsed before the 1996 federal election, Pauline won the division of Oxley seat as an independent.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauline_Hanson

I theorise, Pauline Hanson was chosen by the establishment, running Pauline as an independent candidate, using her obvious dry character traits and introduced by the establishment independent from the Liberal party believed anti racist personal beliefs, scaring Australians into believing Australia was in danger of being overrun by Asians.

Elections have many independent candidates as well as candidates running on the two main party tickets. Yet, Pauline Hanson received far more attention by national media, having entered federal parliament after the 1996 federal election than many other independent politicians could of dreamed.

The Pauline Hanson founded the One Nation party in 1997 gathering media momentum in news stories leading up to the 1998 following election when Pauline lost her seat.

During a recent Pauline Hanson history reminder, it was said Asian news papers during Pauline's time in federal parliament were using Australian media stories “as they always do” printing Pauline Hanson's comments.

I speculate, because the Tiger Economies at the time were experiencing a bubble, finally busting in July 1997 to may 1998. Asians were looking for somewhere outside of Asia to invest their money... property being a favoured investment.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1997_Asian_financial_crisis

During late 1990s, Australian property was being depressed, while share markets were reaching high valuations... peeking in mid 1998, on the back of lowering interest rates.

I suggest, Pauline Hanson was scaring Asians out of investing wealth in Australian property at a time Australian property was cheap to buy.

Once the Asian share market crash came and went, Pauline Hanson had done her job, and was no longer needed.

1999 came the Y2K scare, low property prices, media scaring people out of their property “me included” while property values were low. Property prices continued to be low until the 2002 to 2004 property boom, 9/11 Twin Towers trade centre in fear of world trade collapse was used to further lower interest rates.

Globalisation, promoted as investing superannuation and USA 401K savings in many different countries. People managing their own investment portfolio accounts.

I recently remembered, how I noticed, how the DOW Industrial and Australian ASX index rises over a period of months. Stop rising to hold around the same index number. Soon falling back to around the same low index number as had been earlier.
The DOW has patterns of highs and lows. I speculate, having absolutely no supporting evidence, investors are being drawn into investing in share markets due to these rising periods, holding periods, and falling quicker that rising periods.

The last time the DOW Industrial rose to new highs. Scary financial news reporter Alan Kohler saying no one know why, as indexes finished the run up, Alan Kohler was going on about how Brexit and EU money was looking for a place to go.

Two mentioned share indexes have stopped, holding around their highs. I pose the no significant range movement is encouraging investors into other investments, being that shares have appeared to have ended a run up.

Japanese and European banks never providing any significant interest on bank deposits. Persuading any investors with investment desires to seek other countries for income.
http://www.forecast-chart.com/historical-nikkei-225.html
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/italy/stock-market

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/greece/stock-market

Globalisation: Japanese banks; Italian banks in fear of insolvency; Greece; Brexit; etc. its like investors, “go some where else, this country doesn't want your money”.

Donald Trump closing borders could be a designed intentional tactic, scaring local and foreign investors from investing in the U.S.A.

Money is a token of exchange. Holding money rather than spending money saves the environment. Losing money, saves the environment, depending on who the money is lost to.

I speculate, governments would like citizens to believe governments can't merely print money: to get government out of government debt; to reduce need for taxes; to provide essential services to people who can't afford to buy essential services, unemployment through to medical care.

Whether foreign investment invests in local shares, buys local labour to build new buildings, and or buys existing buildings. The idea of taking foreign currency, exchanging foreign currency credits for another country's currency credits is no different than governments creating currency credits to pay for essential services. Which I say governments do in any case.

I suggest, most all governments allow local companies to offer services, investment products that can be purchased overseas: investment packages; shares and bonds; etc. yet no money credits leaves the country: investment packages don't exist; no shares or bonds are purchased in other countries. Buying shares and bonds from other countries is an allusion, allowing people to believe in globalisation investment.
No local money governing institutions wants other countries money when they can merely invent credits. What some other countries may not want is for citizens to spend money on local property to build new buildings for themselves.

Money supposedly invested in other countries are merely recorded as credits. When investors want money returned: charges; foreign exchange; management fees; foreign stock broker fees; etc, are removed from supposedly returned money form foreign countries to investors.
Money supposedly held in other countries, misappropriated, lost in financial collapses, etc, are least likely to be recovered after fees and legal proceedings.

Their is no difference between: governments inventing currency credits and foreign currency exchanged into another currency buying local labour. Local labour saving earned money in banks and or servicing their own debt. Either way increased credits exist.

A country raising interest rates to restrain CPI inflation, slowing banks lending money to borrowers, borrowers paying more money out of their wages back to banks, leaving borrowers with less money for buying everyday items.
The myth that higher interest rates attracts foreign investment into that higher interest rate country to earn higher interest rates, has banks needing to lend the increased volume of foreign money credits, further overheating an economy, increasing inflation.

When foreign investment leaves a country, for another country for whatever reason, the volume of money circulating into an economy reduces, unemployment increases, workers lose employment, losing an ability to service debt, becoming globalisation excuses.

Most countries restrict local currency actual notes from being removed from the country of origin. USA currency an exception.

Too many banked deposited credits regardless how much borrowed debt exists, the risk of money suddenly coming out of banks buying Australian imported retail goods up for sale, exposing the limited value of money token credits, limited supply of retail goods rising in price, having workers wanting wage increases to buy even higher priced limited supply of retail goods.

Governments not printing money for reason of run away inflation, is but a myth.

Because Australia has a supposed limited number of ASX company shares to go around. The many years workers have been saving money, wages increasing, buying shares. Shares can always be purchased as though there is no limit to the number of shares that can be purchased.

Believing people in other countries are also buying Australian shares, yet after finance media have mentioned money from Europe is looking for somewhere to place the money, I suggest, Australian share prices have not increased that much to indicate any real purchasing of Australian shares.

Considering China have increasing numbers of billionaires, having Chinese billionaires wanting safety for their ever increasing wealth. Again Australian shares are not that volatile as could finance media globalisation mythology would have people believe.

Chinese billionaires want to buy Australians shares, no Chinese currency left China, entering Australia.

Hence why I say, “everything is a lie”.

Lately, sexual abuse inside Australian: university students; military services; corporation office buildings. Narcissism is a state where human incentives to be better than other people, a type of misplaced pride in what the self does, a misplaced sense of self-esteem. Narcissism found in a psychology dictionary as a child behaviour which children grow out of as children become older, narcissism may persist into adulthood.

Young children being bored and or mentally stressed at school, needing self-medication, delusional beliefs to induce chemical rewarding endorphins, children fall into what allows then to feel intelligent, more emotionally intelligent than rationally intelligent.

An emotional child-like desire to feel smart, to have friends see an individual being smart, the type of smart only emotional child-like intelligence would understand, that being a narcissist. Child-like emotional self-gratifying males, having seen pornography, are going to want to progress into what's perceived as adulthood, using ideas seen on pornographic media.

Pornographic media have been around long before the Internet become an easy forum to post pornography. Regardless how illegal pornography has been, pornographic images can be obtained. That being stated, I suggest that not mentioned by the media establishment has been providing pornographic images for many years.

Narcissism behaviour which very young children develop and retain for longer than children should, to ward off: boredom; mental stress; embarrassment denial. I accuse school education of providing an ideal environment for children suffering from describes symptoms, to continue child-like behaviours long after child-like behaviours should have faded away, leaving a mature adult.

Environments: schools; military training; any place where embarrassing humans that can't defend themselves against authority, exists. Out side these environments, narcissism behaviours will resurface in the least able to think clearly human subconscious.

For the same reasons narcissism exists in memories therefore behaviours of people who believe (who feel) they are highly intelligent, the same people can't think to think they have been fooled by globalisation excuses.

Comes down to, school's limited education curriculum, taught while children are being punished for learning what is simple trivial knowledge memory learning, most every child not being mentally stressed, should have been able to remember.

School examinations are about whether children can function while being mentally stressed, memorising simple trivial knowledge including the felt mental stress traumas. Students being able to manage remembering trivial knowledge repressing memorised mental stress traumas, in order to answer examination A to F questions... are what examinations are about.

All the metal depression: school students; soldiers; many professions complain about, I strongly suggest, comes from early childhood schooling.

Prescribed drugs, alcoholism and illegal drug addictions are coming from medicating school student increasing mental stress as students progress through the system.

Why I see globalisation excuses and political lies are because I left school long before HSC examinations, having ignored schooling, never suffering from mental stress.

Because so much emotional gratification and fear is associated with remembering academic information. That so little need to associate school learnt information in some rational terms and value, instead school learnt information is emotional, understanding simple information is emotionally rewarding, providing reasons why information is determined true or false on how information feels.

My above theories are difficult to except, difficult to feel quick rewarding gratification. Most educated humans want to feel good, don't want to feel they're learning something entirely different unless there exists a prolonged reward. Understanding difficult information as a challenge should feel rewards, yet, long term learning stress will convince readers to reject something that feels them to be stressed and or less intelligent than what they felt they were, learning something entirely new.