If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.
Joseph Goebbels

A big lie (German: große Lüge) is a propaganda technique. The expression was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, about the use of a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.

Plan for jobs and growth.

Robert, you have mentioned the "H" word, and the forums 'Sensitive Brigade' aka hard boiled right wingers are most upset with any inconvenient mention of Mr H and by association them. I mentioned him once in passing, and they were most upset, they labeled me a Stalinist and a Trotskyite. They don't agree with labeling of any kind.

Godwin's law applies especially to inappropriate, inordinate, or hyperbolic comparisons of other situations (or one's opponent) with Nazis – often referred to as "playing the Hitler card".

Godwin's law (or Godwin's rule of Nazi analogies) is an Internet adage asserting that "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1—that is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Hitler or Nazism.

i.e. eventually someone will be a dick.

SM: if the cap fits

Robert, I have to correct you, you should have said;

"If the Stahlhelm fits."

Shadow, you are absolutely correct there. just the other day I was on my other forum 'Macrame For Beginners' discussing the merits of the double overlay stitch, when without as mush as a by your leave, or a beg your pardon, mind you, forumite Beryl of Whopping, called me a Nazi! Naturally I could not let that go unchallenged! I escalated the insult and called her a stitch dropper! Well, Beryl threatened to send around her storm troopers to fix up my loom!
Now Herman the forum moderator has given us both 2 weeks in the cooler!

And it fits you so well.

Below is a link to pdfhost.net/ website where I now post PDF file readings that I hope readers will enjoy reading.

The below attachment PDF file is about voters not liking politicians or party policies on fixing global warming. Voters are being guided to opposing political parties by candidates merely stating Climate Change. Voters knowing that CO2 reduction policies will cost jobs.

The PDF file also argues the city of Sydney's economy depends on immigration rather than present population women having babies growth.

Below link to PDF file download:

https://www.pdfhost.net/index.php?Action=Download&File=c4a17d01aa5801ac6dd6f4c43ad36ecb

I also have created a website to post many of my typed up readings:

www.deepthought101.simplesite.com/

I have many readings not yet posted on the website. I particularly encourage, a must read first page “Education” on young children too young to attend school.

The key to all these discussions is the answer to this very basic question which must be asked before there is any discussion of economic policy.

The question is this.

Do we want Australia to by a high skilled, high wage country or do we want Australia to be low skilled low wage country?

Which Australia do you want?

Nothing is possible without a healthy economy.

Labor's plan would lead to a high unemployment economy with lower wages irrespective of skills.

The lying liars party never tell the truth.
How many times are people going to allow themselves to be fooled by these liars?
Everybody who is not brain dead knows the lying liars party will go back on everything they say once/if they are re-elected.
Just like they did last time.
And the time before that.
Indeed every single time they have been voted in they pull the same lying tactics out of their sewer.

Is there anybody stupid enough to still believe their lies?

Shadow, what part of Labor's plan do you think would lead to a high unemployment economy with lower wages irrespective of skills?

The only one of their policies that I think could have that effect is implementing "budget repair" when the opposite (fiscal stimulus) is needed. But unfortunately that seems to be bipartisan consensus.

Actually it's not Goebbels words, but it's not important. I absolutely agree with the author, finally someone opened his eyes!

The practice of creating a political policy announcement which seems to be doomed to fail from the start, was never intended to happen.

Backpacking holiday makers 32.5% tax flat tax on income, instead of getting a tax free threshold of AU$18,000. Delaying changes for 6 months. Backpackers going to other countries like New Zealand for working income.

I suggest the tax changes were never intended to happen.

Whether: under the idea of politics of fear; politicians are seen making policies of increasing tax revenue; for government to be seen to be influenced by public opinion; creating new tax policies, to soon after change their minds, allows important news stories to be heard by media audiences.

I suggest that history has seen many planned changes where after media panellists negative debate, have important announcements backing down, nothing happens, planned changes fading away.

Democratically elected politicians are believed to be the worst, except for all the rest.

Employed by the establishment media are not going to expose planned changes were never intended to happen.

I can't prove whether politicians announcements were meant to happen or not, which makes invented news stories difficult to prove were invented to never happen from the beginning.

Media has hours of television and radio news scheduled programs to fill with pointless to the general public news. ABC24 has 24 hours of news programs to fill with news stories.

I suggest, news stories are important to many people, people in need of being entertained, to why news is called news entertainment. Unfortunately much of the news is more distraction from reality, proven by many of the published new topics on this website. I suggest, establishment paid journalists are starting up pointless new discussions on this website, making it pointless bothering to read pointless discussions. Only pointless new discussions are allowed to be posted.

When posting: family violence; illegal drug addiction; alcoholism; employment skills; mental illness. I focus attention on aged 5 to 9 years school education traumatises children's capacity to learn to think. No person seems to have a capacity to care.

http://deepthought101.simplesite.co

Somehow the website page left out the "m"

http:deepthought101.simplesite.com

Below is a PDF file attachment which I argue that Keating's 1990 to 1992 high interest rate recession was avoidable, high interest rates, intentionally destroying: “Jobs and Growth” and risky investments.

Keating Recession Australia Had To Have.
http://www.pdfhost.net/index.php?Action=Download&File=3602be08fa5b5871e17b38377656568a

More of my opposing what people are told to believe by media, readings can be found at:

http://deepthought101.simplesite.com