cont.

Even though it adds nothing to his case he tells us he was bullied because he is homosexual. He gives examples of the type of behaviour he was subject to and none of these incidents indicate he was bullied because of his sexuality. Even being called a faggot is no proof as to the motivation of the bullies since the same term is used in relation to heterosexual people in order to upset them.

He did not need to tell us he was homosexual at all – it is totally irrelevant to his case. He is trying to gain sympathy by aligning himself with the victimhood which is displayed by many homosexuals who also seek to manipulate society.

The only person to whom his sexuality is at all relevant is you and others on the forum who mention it. Why do you need to bring it up at all? The issue is whether or not he has been bullied and whether the school has been negligent. It is totally irrelevant what his sexuality is but it seems that justice does not matter to you. It seems that all you are interested in is making this into another story of a poor downtrodden homosexual person. What has all that stuff about the police apology got to do with the manipulation of a kid who was bullied? Society might have come a long way in protecting the rights of homosexual people but many homosexual people have a very long way to go in protecting the rights of society’s justice system

".....Society might have come a long way in protecting the rights of homosexual people but many homosexual people have a very long way to go in protecting the rights of society’s justice system."

Jeepers, Paul...looks like we got it wrong. phanto hasn't spent two threads inventing scenarios and denigrating a bullied gay youngster - his entire crusade against this young man is in order to protect "society's justice system".

phanto has been so busy trying to assure us that his target gay person and his accompanying complaint against the school are, in fact, not the crux of the matter at all.

phanto's very real concerns are for all the other people bullied who aren't gay....it's outright "discrimination"! Why should the gay kid get all the publicity?

phanto has completed several backward somersaults with pike to assure as that this young man "probably" wasn't bullied because he was gay - and further - has suggested that the gay kid is perhaps the bully himself.

What phanto doesn't see is how transparent his attack on this young man is.

phanto. point taken, but I am sure you are just as homophobic on this tread as you are on the 'bully' thread. Just a minor point, how are you so sure the kid went to the media, and not the media went to the kid. Most self respecting news outlets have a court reporter or two to sniff out news worth articles.

Yes Piorot, I scored phanto a perfect zero for his several backward somersaults with pike. Next thing phanto will be telling us its all a beat up! The gay kid caused it all by continually bashing his face against the big kids fist! phanto has that on good authority, his own, its all in the article, if you read between the lines.

JUst like Rudd's apology to Indigeneous has done absolutely nothing to reduce sexual abuse, dv and life expectancy so the celebration and promotion of anal sex via the Mardi Gra and national broadcasters and kids 'programs' will not reduce bullying, disease or suicide rates. It will have the opposite affect as many more are brainwashed by this nonsense.

It is obvious that the regressives hate free speach, revert to demonising anyone who disagrees and hate the fact that some are willing to scrutinise the filth of teaching and promoting to young boys and girls anal sex and other filthy practices. And they have the ignorance and arrogance to accuse others of being obsessed with sex when they have no answers.

Hi Paul/Piorot,

I'm sure that you have something positive to contribute to this discussion.

When you're ready ........

In the meantime, perhaps that young homosexual man should be lined up for a Gold Logie: his single example has contributed hugely to the entire 'Safe Schools for Pedophiles' program. Single-handed (well, apart from his friends at La Trobe, and in the Socialist Apologists for Fascism), he has persuaded the home-schooled left that only homosexual kids have ever, in the known history of the world, been bullied at school. It's a bit like Indigenous activists convincing naïve supporters that only Indigenous kids have ever, in history, been taken into care.

Perhaps Phanto's point related to the commonplace observation that pretty much all of us were bullied at school, and so what if this kid thought it was only because he was homosexual ? Was that an outrageous suggestion ? I recall in my first weeks at Wagga High School ('Vincit Qui Se Vincit'), having my bare arse rubbed in the detritus of a very dirty boys' urinal (i.e. the boy's very dirty urinal, not the urinal of very dirty boys). In the classroom, the teacher told me to go home and change. Already madly in love with a couple of the girls, I had to straggle noisomely past their desks, to the derision of most of the class. Halcyon days !

I look forward to your positive contributions if you ever have any :)

Joe

Paul1405:

“Just a minor point, how are you so sure the kid went to the media, and not the media went to the kid.”

What difference does it make? Do you think the story and the photograph were published against his or his mother’s or his lawyer’s will? The ABC would be in big trouble doing that.

What has my homophobia got to do with anything? I said that the kid’s sexuality is totally irrelevant to the case so what is the point of bringing up anything about my attitudes to his sexuality?

It is not about sexuality at all but you want it to be. You want him to join the company of the great homosexual victims of our time. You want to try and elicit sympathy for homosexuals by supporting such manipulative behaviour as has been shown by this kid and his supporters. He is just another example of the greatest evil known to man – criticism of homosexuality.

Why do you need to support such a cause? Are homosexuals so fragile that they have to manipulate the general population in order to get what they want? If what they want is reasonable then why can’t they be like everyone else and present a reasonable argument? The fact that they need to resort to manipulation just shows how unreasonable their arguments are.

They are no longer fighting for their rights which they already have. Now they are manipulating for things that they have no right to at all like restrictions on free speech and the right to criticise. Every time they cry victim they expose how manipulative, devious and dishonest they are because they already have everything they need.