The Forum > General Discussion > Legalizing rape?
Legalizing rape?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- ...
- 11
- 12
- 13
-
- All
Dear Mr Dutton, what do you need to consider? Are you really that dumb that you need to take time out to think about it?
Posted by Mr Opinion, Wednesday, 3 February 2016 6:39:06 PM
| |
Maze. <In a nutshell he's saying rape is bad and to be deplored. But he's also saying that at least some rape is preventable if the women were more guarded about the social situation they place themselves in and legalising rape in social situations would, perforce, change community attitudes about what situations women placed themselves in.>
This sounds like the Muslim mindset of blaming women for rape. If a woman trusts a man thinking he is the really,nicefellow he's Been pretending to be, but it turns out he was setting her up for rape, by getting her To his house for coffee or some such lie. She should be blamed and shamed for trusting that he was a decent person. This isn't far from the mindset in these Arab countries that put women in jail For being raped. Like one woman who was a receptionist at an expensive hotel In Saudi Arabia. She was drugged by one of her fellow workers and raped by him And his friend. Of course they put her in jail because as a woman she apparently Had no right to have a job where she was often alone at the desk. What this bloke is suggesting is appalling. What say he was set up to be in the private residence of a couple of hairy Homosexuals and they rape him and beat him up as well. His fault obviously and he should spend 2years in jail for it. Come on now. Posted by CHERFUL, Wednesday, 3 February 2016 8:58:47 PM
| |
Cherful,
Nope, Return Of Kings is nothing like that and neither are the people who follow it, these "masculinists" are in it for the same reasons as third wave Feminists, they're ugly, autistic or asocial people who have a chip on their shoulder because they didn't get invited out on any dates as teenagers. This about sums them up, Elliot Rodger, the supreme gentleman: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQUW3Km01BM&bpctr=1454574118 Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Thursday, 4 February 2016 5:51:55 PM
| |
//as I said the USA is a repository of English spellings//
On the other hand, they can't spell a simple word like 'mum'. It's not rocket science, seppos: m-u-m spells mum. 'Mom' sounds like a dyslexic's meditation mantra. Posted by Toni Lavis, Thursday, 4 February 2016 10:59:05 PM
| |
Toni,
Mum in England, Mom in the USA and Mam in Ireland and all date from around the same period. Scotland leans toward Mam as well. So what other words can't the Americans spell? Posted by Is Mise, Friday, 5 February 2016 7:19:45 AM
| |
This idiot was never going to come to Australia. It was clearly a publicity seeking stunt from a guy who is already far more famous than he deserves to be. Having said that, few of his critics genuinely thought he was planning on visiting, but they still made various statements to distance themselves from Rhoosh V and make themselves look good. Peter Dutton is a prime example. Rhoosh V isn't the only one manipulating the media.
As Foxy said, freedom of speech stops when people start saying things that endanger others. The infamous rape essay took an odd perspective and was sure to offend many, but it was unlikely to lead to anyone being raped. However, Rhoosh V also wrote a column in October last year, saying that women should have their behaviour controlled and men should use violence to do so. It is quite likely that this type of talk will lead to more domestic violence. He should never be allowed into the country for that reason. On the other hand, many of his critics suggest Rhoosh should be violently punished and If he had made it to Australia, there would be very violent counter demonstrations. Many of his critics have done more to advocate for violence than he has. Posted by benk, Saturday, 6 February 2016 9:50:40 PM
|