The Forum > General Discussion > Putting things into perspective.
Putting things into perspective.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
There is a fascinating article in the Guardian about Adela Pankhurst:
http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/dec/24/wayward-suffragette-adela-pankhurst-and-her-remarkable-australian-life
It would make a riveting Ph.D. for somebody to study the movements to and from the Marxist Left of people like Pankhurst, George Orwell, Howard Fast, Douglas Pike, Sam Wanamaker, Karl Popper, Isaiah Berlin, Frederick Hayek, and so many others - sorry, I can't think of anybody who has moved the other way.
Why did they move towards the Right (or in Pankhurst's case, to the extreme-Right) ?
Was it a personality trait, some fundamental belief which eventually couldn't mesh with Marxism, or was it because the movement moved - as far as they were concerned - in wrong directions, or was taken over by the usual gaggle of careerists ?
Or because of events like the sell-out in Spain, the Molotov-Ribbentrop deal, or the coups in eastern Eruope in the late forties, or the repression of the people in Hungary or the invasion of Czechoslovakia ? Or Cambodia ? Tien An Men ? Bosnia ? Kosovo ? East Timor ?
Hopefully, we learn from our mistakes, so Popper says. T. A. Edison too, with his 2000 failed light bulb experiments. Blueprints, daydreams, can be beautiful, but not if they don't match, or keep up with, reality. If lofty ideals require the sacrifice of other people, perhaps that's a huge mistake right there.
There you go, Foxy: I'm sure that for many people, there have been more than enough incidents to go around.
All the very best,
Love,
Joe