Renee 38
I feel the whole judiciary system is corrupted to the point where it is completely isolated from the rest of our community. No one would venture near it if they have a choice. The American judge who is suing the dry cleaner for $60 million after the loss of a pair of trousers is an indicator of the future. If I had the power I would close all law schools and divert the resources to Science.
WE DO NOT NEED LAWYERS AND THE JUDICERY AS THE SELF APPOINTED HIGH PRIESTS OF OUR SOCIETY. THEY GET AWAY WITH THEIR CRIMES BY CLOAKING IT IN LEGAL PROCEDURE. DON’T FORGET THE TAX DODGING BARRISTERS AND REMEMBER EINFELDT AND HIS TRAFFIC INFRINGEMENT. THEN THERE WAS JUDGE YELDIN (spelling) WHO SPENT ALL THAT TIME IN PUBLIC TOILETS.

ok..thanks for the reply..really appreciate it.i think i know how to write for my research.thanks a lot

renee38
The answer is NO. The family law court now has this new age idea- BE KINDER TO THE MEN.
Umm
I attended a family law court matter last week with a friend. It was down for hearing- FINALLY.

The other party has NOT RESPONDED TO NE LETTER OR COURT ORDER IN THREE YEARS.
The Lady who was kicked out of her house and would have lived on the street if a friend had not taken her in .
Her friend borrowed thirty thousand to help her with court costs THREE YEARS Ago and to buy her a car [pay for operations etc.
She is also being taken to court by the loan company that she was forced to borrow from to pay for even more! legal costs because this low life has not reponded.
The Judge has now given this creep three further adjournments.
Why- Oh hey thats the best part.
Because he failed to file anything to the court after been given 14 days to do so.
Umm I dont mean once I mean four times now.
He even suggested that this bloke apply to the court to have the original orders set aside of which he is in contempt of for two and a half years.
The lady is a invalid penshioner with severe disabilities.
She partly deaf yet the judge has allowed him to do it by phone. He said he can not travel but has been to Germany twice!
Whatever happens now its too late for this lady and her friend who loaned her the money for lawyers.
So they are soon to be BOTH homeless.
Mind you that wont bother the judge tucked up in his warm bed.

People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, I can very much recognise the truth in your story as I have since 1982 conducted a special lifeline service under the motto MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® and assisted many in their court litigation as an Attorney (not as a lawyer).
.
Alice Carter whom also acted as legal adviser for the Northern Territory in her report about a visit to the Family Court at Melbourne remarked;

"unfortunately, much of the proceedings I witnessed were repetitive, and general disorganisation,...."
.
Page 22 27-8-1997
.
"Further more the court was disorganised as many files were missing and cases were adjourned early as many counsel failed to turn up."
.
"The counsels and their clients also presented themselves well dressed and I could see that anyone who was not dressed suitably would be extremely obvious. I felt that the emphasis on looking acceptable could easily disadvantage some people. The whole attitude of the court to parties was rather more authoritarian then supportive,....."
.
"Moreover, I felt that the judges were inclined to be slightly patronising and pedantic."
.
"... and the judge's demands that she speak louder reinforced my observations on the authoritarian, patronising attitudes of the judges."
.
"I am now able to understand the general public's fear of going to court and facing judges; I, too, was overawed by the excessive formality and suprised by the appearance, at least of the judges' authoritarian and patronising attitude towards others in the court room."
.
It ought to be noted that Alice Carter is a lawyer!
.
I think you get the message alright.

Mr Gerrit
Thank you for taking your time to comment on this ladies position.
I have not checked this thread for a while so i apoligise for the delay.
The thing is the lady had to use legal aid the last two times.
I personally contacted the lawyer from legal aid and told him I thought it VITAL he file something to the court to explain her postion[ ie Being severed with section 280 papers- in default of re payments to loan sharks that another lawyer talked he into borrowing from the pay his costs.
He filed not one scap of paper[ although the original application for the intravention orders does mention she ows large amounts for years and his own brain should tell him its been almost three years.
I have arrnged for her now to obtain [ another lawyer] but yet again nothings been filed. Thats depite this one agreeing its vital.
Nor has she had a conference with her or the new barrister. I just think this is GROSS neglect and I am thinking of getting her to go up and file herself.
the 14days the court gave is up on tuesday.[ That two days from now.
It might get the lawyers off side but at least if the judge could read some of the history he may be in a postion to be a bit more fair being more informed.
Of course that might get the lawyer off side but thats probably too bad.
If you dont mind my asking what would you do?
File? Or just go along for another day of nothing happening
My gut feeling is to file the papers

I didn't get to this tread for some days. I take it that the case was in court in recent days?
If you write me an email then perhaps it might be better to save time.
My email address in on my website http://www.schorel-hlavka.com and my blog
http://au.360.yahoo.com/profile-ijpxwMQ4dbXm0BMADq1lv8AYHknTV_QH

.
In 1982 I created a document titled "ADDRESS TO THE COURT" and this has since been used in all levels of courts including the High Court of Australia, in both civil and criminal matters.
.
ON 1-11-2003 I DID PUBLISH A BOOK ABOUT IT ALSO;
.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & ADDRESS TO THE COURT
A book on CD, making litigation a more level playing field
ISBN 0-9580569-7-8 (After 1-1-2007; ISBN 978-0-9580569-7-7
.
I will await your email.