The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > The rise and fall of ICAC

The rise and fall of ICAC

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. All
I agree Sm Vetting is a privacy issue
But all public servants need to be vetted now
and tspv you have to 1 not lie 2 divulge all investments/dealings shares etc
you have to divulge all known persons
any if all crimes
And if you are found to have lied about these things Clearance is not given or is revoked
How many current members do you think would still be in office i recon 50% gone before vetting started and at least another 25% gone during vetting. Politicians lord it over Public servants that HAVE to be cleared why not them as well ?
Posted by Aussieboy, Sunday, 3 May 2015 11:21:58 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Paul,

I congratulate you on walking past a police station without being arrested.

A little knowledge is not as dangerous as complete ignorance. All I was saying the limits and responsibilities of the various bodies is the very base of law, much like the times table is taught at the beginning of maths.

Without even the basics you can easily say something wildly stupid.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Sunday, 3 May 2015 11:25:02 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Put up or shut up! I am waiting, waiting, still waiting, my "learned friend". Law, evidence, Shadow Minister, should not been used in the same sentence. on the same thread, even in the same century.
Posted by Paul1405, Sunday, 3 May 2015 1:15:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
You mean the $1.5M bribe they took from Wotif, and the dirty money they took from the crooked CFMEU?
Posted by Shadow Minister, Sunday, 3 May 2015 2:04:58 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Shadow, please put up the evidence of corruption by the Greens, what sort of lawyer are you, just because you say it, does not make it true.
How about the million dollar sponsors to The Liberal Party, just to name a few, Cormack Foundation Pty Ltd $1,500,000, Nimrod Resources Limited 500,000, who is Jiebo Huang, who gave The Liberal Party $250,000, is he a member of the Communist Party of China's Politburo, I don't know.

I have called you on those fictitious claims of your, and you have been shown to be full of the good old fashioned P&W when it comes to providing evidence. I ask for the umteenth time where is your evidence, you have none, because there is none. Me thinks its time for you to cut and run, again!
Posted by Paul1405, Monday, 4 May 2015 7:07:13 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Paul,

I can see that you want to deflect from your deep ignorance of the law, but this is pathetic.

The evidence is clear, the systemically corrupt gangreen party led by Crusty Minge took the largest ever bribe of $1.5m. This is on top of payments from the organised crime mob known as the CFMEU.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Monday, 4 May 2015 9:02:52 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy