The Forum > General Discussion > Racisim is alive and well, but we dare not question it hey!
Racisim is alive and well, but we dare not question it hey!
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
Posted by rehctub, Saturday, 28 February 2015 9:47:51 AM
| |
As you say it is not equitable butch. I personally have no issue with the broader support to aboriginals as a special group in the wider community.
We spend more money on foreign aid than we do on our indigenous, and that money does not go back into our economy. I wont whinge about welfare because I know that 99% of that money goes straight back into our economy within a fortnight. Posted by sonofgloin, Saturday, 28 February 2015 11:24:51 AM
| |
after 200 years, and if we are still treating them differently, that my friend , IS RACISM !
Posted by platypus1900, Saturday, 28 February 2015 4:57:58 PM
| |
If you're not a fan of welfare of this type it's your duty to get every cent of every government allowance you're entitled to lest it end up in the hands of bludgers. Anyone who is still breaking their back working in this day and age is a fool, do the minimum amount you require to get by and let the state provide the rest.
Better yet invest your money in a bottle shop or a fried chicken franchise in a highly welfare dependant suburb, your taxes will flow back into your pocket in no time. Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Saturday, 28 February 2015 6:56:04 PM
| |
The politics of envy!
Very ugly flesher. Would you prefer your workmate was homeless? Realtors are notorious for racist treatment of indigenous renters. Hence why they get together and use their aboriginal organisations to help out. I bet you prefer the "blacks" to be living in the river bed or in humpys on the outskirts of country towns? Or maybe you think we should just give them some "blankets" and then they will go away? Giving disadvantaged people a hand up is not racism. Do you feel the same about all the whiteys getting public housing assistance. What do you say to all those who receive rental assistance from the government? Overwhelmingly white recipients? Why single out aboriginals? Racism thats why. Almost any koorie would swap places with you flesher. Would you swap with them? Posted by mikk, Sunday, 1 March 2015 8:37:46 AM
| |
Mikk, ......Would you prefer your workmate was homeless?
No, i would preffer he was treated the same as anyother Austrlian earning a decent income. His partner also receives a pension for being aboriginal. ....Realtors are notorious for racist treatment of indigenous renters. One could also say that indigenous renters (not all) have a bad reputation for destroying the houses they live in. Fact! .... I bet you prefer the "blacks" to be living in the river bed or in humpys on the outskirts of country towns? Or maybe you think we should just give them some "blankets" and then they will go away? No, not at all I just don't see why they, while in a normal functioning relationship should receive such preferential treatment. .....Giving disadvantaged people a hand up is not racism. whats the disadvantage about a guy who earns a grand a week, yet, simply because he is with an aboriginal partner, gets a house at a 75% discount, no bond and no commitment what so ever and no end date. In fact, this is a true case of reverse racism as the other guy who has a white partner, earns the same amount, for the same job, pays full freight rent, a $1600 bond and is fully accountable and knows that being in a mining town, he could be squeezed out in six months. $87 per week, when your partner earns $1000 per week, just because you're indigenous is a joke. Of cause on top of that she also gets a pension just for being an aboriginal and sadly pisses most of that against the wall. If aboriginals wish to be treated as every day Australians, surely the hand outs, when not needed, should be cut. Posted by rehctub, Sunday, 1 March 2015 9:20:43 AM
| |
@rehctub
i agree with your responses very fair Posted by platypus1900, Sunday, 1 March 2015 10:00:36 AM
| |
Piss it up against a wall, well there could be worse options. Think of the publican or the butcher down the road if that person did not have an abo; pension. It all ends up back in revenue.
Posted by 579, Sunday, 1 March 2015 10:07:18 AM
| |
579, while I accept the money ends up in circulation, the problem I have with all welfare waste, is that it's mostly the kids who miss out, simply because many parents choose booze &cigs, gambling, even drugs at times ahead of the needs of their children because after all, the children are the intended recipients of a large portion of that welfare and they have no control over it.
Yes a fair portion comes back, but it doesn't address child poverty. My point is welfare is for the needy and for one to receive such generous hand outs while in a functioning income earning relationship, simply for being Aboriginal is wrong. Welfare is also intended as a 'hand up' to help people in need, not a 'hand out' which it obviously is in this case. With some 200 plus years having past since white man came, at what point are these people going to stand on their own two feet and stop their reliance on unbalanced welfare hand outs. Posted by rehctub, Sunday, 1 March 2015 12:59:02 PM
| |
Dear rehctub,
I don't know the precise circumstances of your colleague and his partner and what qualifies them to receive the benefits that you're referring to. I'm sure there must be something more to it than what you know. Opinion polls repeatedly show large sections of the population favouring cuts in welfare spending or favouring plans to "make welfare recipients go to work." We're regularly being told that welfare is a terrible burden on the taxpayer (welfare represents a tiny percentage of the federal budget). Why do these attitudes persist? There is an ideology in this country that holds that everyone has the same chance to get ahead. Therefore it stand to reason that - if those who get ahead can claim credit for their success, then those who fall behind must, logically be blamed for their failures. The disadvantaged are therefore supposed to need incentives to work, rather than help at the expense of the taxpayer. There are few complaints, however, about how we pay out far more in "handouts" to the nonpoor than to the poor - in the form of tax deductions, and hidden subsidies, rather than the direct form of cash payments. Ah well, perhaps we need to look at the system that we have created in this country and decide whether we need to preserve, modify, or change it completely, so that its more equitable for all concerned. Afterall if we created it - we can surely modify it as well. Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 1 March 2015 1:46:03 PM
| |
@foxy
i concur Posted by platypus1900, Sunday, 1 March 2015 2:00:51 PM
| |
Dear rehctub,
I've just come across a website that might be of some interest. There's a chapter in it on whether Indigenous people get extra funding that might be worth reading. We're told that generally Indigenous people receive the same level of public benefits as non-Indigenous people and that they do not get extra funding just because they are Indigenous. However, there are specific government programs that have been introduced to help those economically and otherwise disadvantaged. http://www.humanrights.gov.au/publications/questions-and-answers-about-aboriginal-torres-strait-islander-peoples It's worth a read. Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 1 March 2015 2:41:03 PM
| |
Dear Platy,
Thank You. Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 1 March 2015 2:42:28 PM
| |
@foxy
why is the young poiro lady so upset? tell her to have patience with an old man of 115 tell her sometimes simple lines are clearer than seemingly elegant verbiage .... btw... the punctuation marks like "..." is part of a very simple communication process . = full stop .. = stop but think ... = thinking .... = must think but be careful not to think like poirot CAPS = help poirot to focus as she often thinks too deeply :) Posted by platypus1900, Sunday, 1 March 2015 2:50:57 PM
| |
Dear Platy,
Who am I to give advice to anyone - either you or Poirot? I am barely capable of correcting my own stuff-ups. I'm sure that you two will work things out for yourself. Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 1 March 2015 4:18:33 PM
| |
why get so touchy about the aborigines?
isnt that racism? it is so hypocritical we give them nice names but deep inside we still hold on to our biased views Posted by platypus1900, Sunday, 1 March 2015 5:55:30 PM
| |
Dear Platy,
I hope that much has changed regarding our Indigenous People in many respects. Much has been achieved. Tolerance and understanding has broadened out and hopefully bigotry is in retreat. However, many of us don't really understand the plight of our Indigenous People and the problems they have to live with. I certainly don't fully understand so many things - especially living in the city as I do. I rarely come into contact with any Indigenous People. I can only make summations from what I read. And I guess there's many Australians in the same boat. Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 1 March 2015 6:04:34 PM
| |
@foxy
i have a fren who is doing a phd on our indigenous people we have long discussions on this matter and i must say i have learnt much from this friend on why white australians and new zealanders treated the natives so differently... one with contempt and the other with uneasy respect nations conquer foreign lands for various reasons i do not wish to go into a lengthy poirotic discourse on this (maybe i will learn to do it at the higher tweeter level..hhh) 200 years ago england came to conquer and claiming this land for their king the first admirals called this land 'terra nullis' because they do not even see the natives fit enough to be called human never mind about all the wrongs done it had been done no one sane enough will want to advocate turning the clock no amount of apologies will make it right let us go beyond apologies over and over again... it is so tiring and does not make anything better the impt lesson to learn is a. there will continue to be wars b. there will continue to be the taking over of lands BUT, let us remember to treat the conquered fairly and humanely as we ourselves will be the conquered one day Posted by platypus1900, Sunday, 1 March 2015 6:33:27 PM
| |
what I have given to Aboriginals
- food on the street - food in my home - lifts in my car - various goods at my cost what I have received - being called a white __ - beaten aboriginal women on my doorstep - wife being called a white _ with threat of rape - having young aboriginal steal my wifes jewelery I fell very sorry for them and will continue to help where I can. What I detest is the progressives with their rewritten history that encourages blatant racism from aboriginals and the constant victim mentality given to them leading to the above behaviours. Posted by runner, Sunday, 1 March 2015 6:54:42 PM
| |
@runner
i understand what you are saying it is sad i am of the opinion that there must be an end to apologies but on the other hand, we must understand the natives have a very very different mindset, something very ingrained to their way of looking at life and it is going to take many many more generations for this to be resolved the solution is the dying out of a culture... very sad whites, some islanders, some asian culture are tribal and warlike we must understand that the australian natives and the malays etc are not like that they believe they are part of a greater Mother Nature they live peaceably with the change in the seasons and the elements this is a very difficult problem i have no answer Posted by platypus1900, Sunday, 1 March 2015 7:03:58 PM
| |
Careful everyone, Andrew Bolt found himself jerked into court for less
that what I have seen here. Posted by Bazz, Monday, 2 March 2015 3:52:59 PM
| |
'Careful everyone, Andrew Bolt found himself jerked into court for less
that what I have seen here. yes Bazz the regressives hate their lies being exposed. Nothing new though. Posted by runner, Monday, 2 March 2015 4:49:31 PM
| |
I must be a racist, I got an aboriginal houseboy sacked once, in Townsville, in about 1948. I would have been about 8.
My parents were members of a group who, in those glorious days before TV, videos & all this modern stuff, played cards at various of a groups homes each week. One couple had a reputation for serving beautiful toast at supper. The group were discussing this beautiful toast, & wondering how the house boy made it so good. It was no great secret. A couple of us kids had been had been out in the kitchen watching him spin his magic. They wanted to know, so I told them, the secret. He popped the butter into his mouth, chewed it until soft, then dribbled it onto the toast spreading it as he did. I could not understand what I had done to cause so much excitement. Did I become a racist that day, or was I born that way, or was it racist for the group to be upset? PS. Did you like that one Poirot. Posted by Hasbeen, Monday, 2 March 2015 6:51:24 PM
| |
Foxy, I can only assume that this guys partner has rented the house and his income is not declared, or something like that.
My issue is, at what point are indigenous people going to stop being indigenous and stand on their own two feet. They get all the assistance in the world if they want it, at no charge, they get cheap housing, cheap loans yet there are very few genuine Aborigines left on our land, so one can't help but wonder just how many are simply riding the gravy train for it's worth. I can assure you that if an indigenous person applies fir a job at a mine site, they will get it. We provide the assistance, we provide all but free housing, we have even apologized for past wrong doings, although not with my support, so I ask again, when are they going to move on and make something of themselves and break away from this ongoing welfare deoendancy.. If one wants to be treated as equal, surely they must stand up and be counted. Posted by rehctub, Monday, 2 March 2015 8:06:32 PM
|
With rents averaging $300 per week, it just goes to show that the racism card is a one way street.