The Forum > General Discussion > Labor's Speaker found guilty of dishonesty.
Labor's Speaker found guilty of dishonesty.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- ...
- 52
- 53
- 54
-
- All
Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 29 July 2014 2:36:56 PM
| |
Dear Shadow Minister,
Shame on you! Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 29 July 2014 3:08:08 PM
| |
G'day there FOYLE...
I agree with much of what you've said, when you state that all sides of politics have their collective snouts in the trough. What I do find curious though, I'm sure some (perhaps many) people enter parliament with the firm intent of serving their electorate, and the country in toto. Then over time a strange transformation or metamorphoses seems to occur and even the most ethical, most principled politician ends up in the gutter with his/her many cohorts, clawing away as much of the public's munificence, as can be managed. Over my thirty two years as a copper, I've locked up better, more principled, even more ethical crooks, then many of those slugs who laughingly call themselves politicians. Posted by o sung wu, Tuesday, 29 July 2014 3:52:35 PM
| |
Dear O Sung Wu,
According to Peter Coleman - whatever they may say, most politicians do not go into Parliament to bring about particular reforms; they go in because they find the life irresistible. They want to be in it all their lives. They enjoy its exhilarating highs and take its miserable (and tedious) lows in their stride. They face long years in the wilderness with equanimity. They take fro granted the slander of fools. They also believe that the voters will get it right in the end. Their day will come. They are politicians in the way others are poets. They simply can't help themselves. Coleman tells us that Peter Costello (his son-in-law) was not like that. To Peter Costello all that stuff (according to Coleman) is the excuse of the seat-warmer, the hack, the careerist, or at best the adventurer. Coleman states that Costello belonged to a different parliamentary tradition. That Costello did go into Parliament to make a difference. I wonder how many of today's politicians can genuinely and honestly make that claim - and have it be true? Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 29 July 2014 4:04:13 PM
| |
Here we go...
"Taxpayers have forked out close to $330,000, including $800 for a door knob, for a border protection media briefing room that hasn't been used since its completion 10 months ago. Construction and fit-out costs for the high-tech theatrette totalled almost $235,000 while the annual cost of having it on stand-by is running at about $100,000. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/government-pays-330000-for-a-room-it-doesnt-use-20140729-zy16r.html#ixzz38pqkPw9r SM - don't hold up Idiot Boy and his Tin Pot Govt as something to behold....they are a joke - and one in very poor taste. Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 29 July 2014 4:15:38 PM
| |
Dear Poirot,
The current polls should tell Shadowm Minister what Australian voters are really feeling about the current political situation. Shadow Minister is grabbing at sraws with threads like this one. And being extremely one-eyed. As I stated earlier - "Shame on Him!" Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 29 July 2014 4:20:43 PM
|
"Pot, Kettle. At least the coalition has achieved more in 10 months than Labor did in 6 years."
Well yes...but perhaps mayhem and laughter weren't exactly what the electorate had in mind.
(found my popcorn:)