P,

If you think this is BS, then perhaps you could list the criticisms by Labor or Greens MPs of Palmer within the 24hrs of his comments. You will find virtually none. From what I saw on twitter, the majority of left whingers could not see the problem.

Whether I am a defender of women's rights is not the issue here. What is clear is that neither labor nor the greens can claim to be either.

SM: Whether I am a defender of women's rights

I don't see this as a "Women's Rights" issue. It's just an "Issue" that's all. Would the same kerfuffle had happened if it had been a bloke & he'd been on Hormone treatment to up his sperm count?. I don't think so.

The whole thing was a Media beat up to sell papers. That's all. Nothing more, nothing less. Neither side bothered about it until the Press pushed the matter. Then the angry Politics on both sides thought it might be a good point scoring ploy.

I really wouldn't give a dam if she had three tits & an upside down t#0t.

Well, there's a first!

>>(deleted for being highly intelligent)
Posted by Nhoj, Sunday, 15 June 2014 7:22:11 PM<<

Wonders will never cease. I've seen Nhoj's posts referred to in many fine terms - but 'highly intelligent'? That really takes the cake.
Bless the Moderator for superb diplomacy.

On Topic: Peta Credlin seems certainly to have been taking opportunity to shed light on Tony Abbott's credentials as a family man with a nicely female wife and three nicely female daughters.
I see nothing wrong with that, and if some wish to view this as political 'point-scoring' so be it, but I see no point in making a big thing out of it at all.

As for Big Clive putting his foot in it - well, what's new?

ALP and Greens being rather quiet on the matter - small potatoes; who really cares? It wasn't as if the matter really deserved too much attention.

I wonder if SM suspects that the ALP and Greens were keeping 'mum' essentially to keep on the good side of good old Clive?
Still, probably better to 'let sleeping dogs lie', as it were.

Tony's a real champ, and there's no mistaking that; and Peta is shaping up to be a real asset (bless her little heart).

I doubt that. It's the first thing you've said that has made any sense. ;-)

OLD SALT
SALTY PETER
mate..are you not seeing creativity..of backwards john
not grayham...backwards john has fooled the salty peter

User Details : Nhoj

The Forum > User Index > Nhoj
Most Recent 10 Posts
» 15/06/2014 7:37:57 PM (deleted, you must not disagree with rehctub).....
» 15/06/2014 7:36:16 PM (deleted for abuse of Tony Abbott).....
» 15/06/2014 7:33:52 PM (deleted, not allowed to make fun of Hasbeen).....
» 15/06/2014 7:31:45 PM (deleted for criticising Hasbeen).....
» 15/06/2014 7:30:04 PM (deleted, greenies not allowed).....
» 15/06/2014 7:28:34 PM (deleted for being too left wing).....
» 15/06/2014 7:27:21 PM (deleted for non conformity).....
» 15/06/2014 7:26:06 PM (deleted for being too politically correct).....
» 15/06/2014 7:22:11 PM (deleted for being highly intelligent).....
» 13/06/2014 1:24:02 PM [Deleted for abuse.].....

» View complete Comment History for Nhoj

he posted fast and furious..333 posts last time i checked

so TILL I SEE gRAYHAM SIGN HIS WORK..I SEE THE WORKINGS OF A BACKWARDS JONNY COME LATELY..dammcaps..liKe a candle making wind

At last in the SMH

"This was wrong and offensive on several levels. First, PPL is not Credlin’s personal policy, but one Abbott touted before he worked with her. Second, Credlin is already eligible for benefits offered to public servants – the point of the PPL scheme aims to extend this to others.

Third, it is misleading to suggest PPL would benefit only a tiny group of high-earning women, instead of all working women, most of whom would be on better packages. This is not greed.

Fourth, and worst, it was particularly disgraceful because the respected Peta Credlin has been through several unsuccessful rounds of IVF – always a difficult and painful process. Yes, Credlin had revealed her battle with IVF to a reporter in the past, but flinging the most intimate struggles of a staffer into the public sphere to prove a political point is a shameful thing to do."