Poirot,

I see Foxy has at least taken the moral high ground too.

WRT the number of cartoons, given your predilection for only left whinge blogs, etc, I am surprised that you see any criticism of the left at all, I however, see plenty.

The response from Labor and Greens polies is pitiful. A few days after the fact we get a handful of lukewarm tut tuts only after being exposed as hypocrites.

I see that Nhoj, 579 Poirot, and the other usual hypocrites have all failed to indicate any opposition to this blatant sexism

Nhoj, "Runner is a typical immoral Catholic who "excuses" the rife pedophilia in Catholicism by pointing out the fact it occurs elsewhere"

BS, try playing the ball and not the man. You are fabricating as usual to poison the well. I have never seen Runner excuse child abuse. He has always done the opposite in fact. His views are not immoral either.

The danger is that you encourage a perception that all or most child abuse is limited to male Catholic priests.

I am not a person with Runner's faith. It is a very great pity that I have to add that qualification lest you stupidly and unfairly level the same accusation at me.

Dear SM,

Can't we just for a change discuss policies instead of
turning everything into a Left/Right divide or
grabbing at straws with personal attacks. I watched
the Bob Hawke/John Howard appearance on the National
Press Club recently and I was quite impressed by Mr
Hawke's professionalism in not blaming any side of
politics (even the current budget debacle). He remained
totally professional and diplomatic.

We need to see more of that sort of leadership today.
More caring for what's good for the country then
personal political agendas.

What on earth happened to the co-operation that used to
exist between parties and pollies in the past.

We could of course make an effort to change things on OLO.

Or are some of us so brain-dead that all we're capable of
doing is attacking each other. Remember your delightful
"pigeon and chess" quote?

Here's a few more quotes from our new "feminist", Shadow Minister:

In addition to, "Juliar is a complete idiot" and "Now it's time for the red haired weasel to face the music" and "Juliar may have slept around" and "Was she so stupid" we now have from Shadow Minister ......

(1)"deleted for abuse" ...http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4290&page=0#108622

(2)"Lexi (a woman), you are completely shameless"...http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5625&page=0#156255

(3)"deleted for abuse" ...http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15638&page=0#270937

(4)"Juliar will be remembered as a stain" http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5625&page=0#155739

(5)"deleted for abuse" ...http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5157&page=0#139259

(6)regarding Julia Gillard "a deceitful and untrustworthy weasel" ... http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5625&page=0#155560

I wonder why our new sensitive feminist, Shadow Minister, is so sensitive to the feelings of Peta Credlin (a hard line, feisty CONSERVATIVE) in light of his repeated personal abuse towards women and his repeated deletions for personal abuse? Hmmmmm.

Click on the links folks ... there's the *PROOF* that the poor, little, sensitive, new age, feminist Shadow Minister is "really" a HYPOCRITE, and merely a radical rightie pawn and abusive dogamatist, who doesn't give a damn about respecting women.

Shadow Minister didn't start this topic because he was *OUTRAGED* at a slur against a woman (as he is "pretending"). He started this topic as a vehicle to slight who he considers his political enemies. He doesn't give a damn about women.

The empirical proof has been presented. Case closed.

Foxy,

I would be happy to simply discuss policies and have done so several times. However, it is difficult to show restrain when individuals are only capable of slogans and insults.

But to be honest, I have seen similar insults over footy teams.

'Runner is a typical immoral Catholic who "excuses" the rife pedophilia in Catholicism by pointing out the fact it occurs elsewhere.'

Nhoj

u r a typical leftist revisionist who knows only moral relativism.
btw I am not a Catholic so try revising your filthy little fables to fit your narrative.