The Forum > General Discussion > Has the Coalition DOUBLED Australia's deficit? Yes, and here's the proof.
Has the Coalition DOUBLED Australia's deficit? Yes, and here's the proof.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Page 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- ...
- 66
- 67
- 68
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
>waffle repeated in parrot fashion by the backyard economic experts.<
Sums up Nhoj - excepting 'dunce' would be a better final descriptor.
Nhoj has provided no 'proof', just a regurgitation of Labor 'spin'.
Sure, 4-year forward estimated deficit (supposedly) of $123 billion, of which $68 billion (approx) is due to Labor PEFO (and earlier MYEFO) mis-calculation and deception (to make them look less fiscally challenged), including a host of UN-FUNDED programs neatly hidden 'under the rug'.
Labor has been the absolute champion of promises it could absolutely NOT deliver.
And there is no way of wriggling out of these FACTS.
In 6 years in government, Labor never got it right once - time after time 'guaranteeing' reduced deficits and a return to budget surplus, 'just over the horizon', until finally forced to admit they got it just so WRONG.
Wayne Swan, champion 'illusionist'.
Why in heaven's name would anyone trust Shorten or Bowen (or Labor in general) when it comes to the real facts or when it comes to fiscal competence?
Name me a Labor government which has produced a surplus - or even a manageable deficit.
Who would YOU trust to get us out of a Labor-generated fiscal 'black hole'?
Nhoj a pragmatist, or a realist? No, just opinionated.
It's just so sad really. Potential promise, misguided, unfulfilled.
As for Luddy, I think he has a point.
Disaster restorations, and 'relief', may add to GNP (through construction activity), but in the end you're back to square-one. The input has not generated an ongoing increase in productivity (just a restoration of the status quo), but has incurred taxpayer expenditure - which will have to be recovered from somewhere, won't it.
Immigration may add to GNP, but does it add to GDP? The 'theory' would say that it does - over the long term, IF it's the right kind of immigration and IF the government(s) can balance the books along the way.